Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share 22. Chemtrade: How should courts use evidence about contract negotiation to interpret the words of a contract?
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
22. Chemtrade: How should courts use evidence about contract negotiation to interpret the words of a contract?
In Chemtrade v. Superior Plus, Alberta’s Court of Appeal considered the extent to which courts can use evidence of a contract’s surrounding circumstances and parties’ “common understanding” to interpret the written terms of a contract. Adam Goldenberg speaks with McCarthy Tétrault partner Laura Gill and associate Emily Ward about the implications for businesses negotiating commercial agreements.
View all episodes
By McCarthy TétraultIn Chemtrade v. Superior Plus, Alberta’s Court of Appeal considered the extent to which courts can use evidence of a contract’s surrounding circumstances and parties’ “common understanding” to interpret the written terms of a contract. Adam Goldenberg speaks with McCarthy Tétrault partner Laura Gill and associate Emily Ward about the implications for businesses negotiating commercial agreements.