Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share A Summary of Microsoft Research and Carnegie Mellon's 'Can large language models explore in-context?'
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
A Summary of Microsoft Research and Carnegie Mellon's 'Can large language models explore in-context?'
This is a summary of the AI research paper: Can large language models explore in-context?
Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.15371.pdf
This summary is AI generated, however the creators of the AI that produces this summary have made every effort to ensure that it is of high quality.
As AI systems can be prone to hallucinations we always recommend readers seek out and read the original source material. Our intention is to help listeners save time and stay on top of trends and new discoveries.
You can find the introductory section of this recording provided below...
This summary is based on the article "Can Large Language Models Explore In-Context?" published in March 2024 by Akshay Krishnamurthy and others, with affiliations to Microsoft Research and Carnegie Mellon University. The paper undertakes an investigation into the capabilities of contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs), such as Gpt-3.5, Gpt-4, and Llama2, to perform exploration tasks intrinsic to reinforcement learning and decision-making without any training interventions. This research probes the native capacities of these models by deploying them as agents within multi-armed bandit (MAB) environments, where the environment's description and the interaction history are fully encapsulated within the LLM prompts themselves.
The core objective was to determine whether these LLMs can exhibit exploration behaviors crucial for decision-making - specifically, whether they can effectively gather information to reduce uncertainty and make informed decisions. To this extent, the study employed various prompt designs to test the models' exploration tendencies. The findings were largely nuanced. It was observed that in most configurations, the LLMs failed to engage in robust exploratory behavior, with only one particular setup (involving Gpt-4, chain-of-thought reasoning, and an externally summarized interaction history) resulting in satisfactory exploration. This outcome underscores the importance of external summarization is facilitating effective exploratory behavior in LLMs, a technique that may not be universally applicable in more complex decision-making contexts.
The paper brings to light the vital insight that while LLMs like Gpt-4 possess the potential for exploration when the prompts are meticulously crafted, the broader application of LLMs as decision-making agents in complex environments still necessitates significant algorithmic interventions. These interventions might include methods like fine-tuning or dataset curation to enrich the LLMs' decision-making capabilities. Essentially, the study articulates a nuanced understanding of LLMs' in-context exploration abilities, emphasizing the necessity for continued research and development to harness these models' full decision-making potential. Through a series of experiments and meticulous prompt engineering, the research offers vital contributions towards understanding the limitations and capabilities of LLMs in reinforcement learning contexts.
Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.15371.pdf
This summary is AI generated, however the creators of the AI that produces this summary have made every effort to ensure that it is of high quality.
As AI systems can be prone to hallucinations we always recommend readers seek out and read the original source material. Our intention is to help listeners save time and stay on top of trends and new discoveries.
You can find the introductory section of this recording provided below...
This summary is based on the article "Can Large Language Models Explore In-Context?" published in March 2024 by Akshay Krishnamurthy and others, with affiliations to Microsoft Research and Carnegie Mellon University. The paper undertakes an investigation into the capabilities of contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs), such as Gpt-3.5, Gpt-4, and Llama2, to perform exploration tasks intrinsic to reinforcement learning and decision-making without any training interventions. This research probes the native capacities of these models by deploying them as agents within multi-armed bandit (MAB) environments, where the environment's description and the interaction history are fully encapsulated within the LLM prompts themselves.
The core objective was to determine whether these LLMs can exhibit exploration behaviors crucial for decision-making - specifically, whether they can effectively gather information to reduce uncertainty and make informed decisions. To this extent, the study employed various prompt designs to test the models' exploration tendencies. The findings were largely nuanced. It was observed that in most configurations, the LLMs failed to engage in robust exploratory behavior, with only one particular setup (involving Gpt-4, chain-of-thought reasoning, and an externally summarized interaction history) resulting in satisfactory exploration. This outcome underscores the importance of external summarization is facilitating effective exploratory behavior in LLMs, a technique that may not be universally applicable in more complex decision-making contexts.
The paper brings to light the vital insight that while LLMs like Gpt-4 possess the potential for exploration when the prompts are meticulously crafted, the broader application of LLMs as decision-making agents in complex environments still necessitates significant algorithmic interventions. These interventions might include methods like fine-tuning or dataset curation to enrich the LLMs' decision-making capabilities. Essentially, the study articulates a nuanced understanding of LLMs' in-context exploration abilities, emphasizing the necessity for continued research and development to harness these models' full decision-making potential. Through a series of experiments and meticulous prompt engineering, the research offers vital contributions towards understanding the limitations and capabilities of LLMs in reinforcement learning contexts.
View all episodes
By James Bentley
4.5
22 ratings
This is a summary of the AI research paper: Can large language models explore in-context?
Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.15371.pdf
This summary is AI generated, however the creators of the AI that produces this summary have made every effort to ensure that it is of high quality.
As AI systems can be prone to hallucinations we always recommend readers seek out and read the original source material. Our intention is to help listeners save time and stay on top of trends and new discoveries.
You can find the introductory section of this recording provided below...
This summary is based on the article "Can Large Language Models Explore In-Context?" published in March 2024 by Akshay Krishnamurthy and others, with affiliations to Microsoft Research and Carnegie Mellon University. The paper undertakes an investigation into the capabilities of contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs), such as Gpt-3.5, Gpt-4, and Llama2, to perform exploration tasks intrinsic to reinforcement learning and decision-making without any training interventions. This research probes the native capacities of these models by deploying them as agents within multi-armed bandit (MAB) environments, where the environment's description and the interaction history are fully encapsulated within the LLM prompts themselves.
The core objective was to determine whether these LLMs can exhibit exploration behaviors crucial for decision-making - specifically, whether they can effectively gather information to reduce uncertainty and make informed decisions. To this extent, the study employed various prompt designs to test the models' exploration tendencies. The findings were largely nuanced. It was observed that in most configurations, the LLMs failed to engage in robust exploratory behavior, with only one particular setup (involving Gpt-4, chain-of-thought reasoning, and an externally summarized interaction history) resulting in satisfactory exploration. This outcome underscores the importance of external summarization is facilitating effective exploratory behavior in LLMs, a technique that may not be universally applicable in more complex decision-making contexts.
The paper brings to light the vital insight that while LLMs like Gpt-4 possess the potential for exploration when the prompts are meticulously crafted, the broader application of LLMs as decision-making agents in complex environments still necessitates significant algorithmic interventions. These interventions might include methods like fine-tuning or dataset curation to enrich the LLMs' decision-making capabilities. Essentially, the study articulates a nuanced understanding of LLMs' in-context exploration abilities, emphasizing the necessity for continued research and development to harness these models' full decision-making potential. Through a series of experiments and meticulous prompt engineering, the research offers vital contributions towards understanding the limitations and capabilities of LLMs in reinforcement learning contexts.
Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.15371.pdf
This summary is AI generated, however the creators of the AI that produces this summary have made every effort to ensure that it is of high quality.
As AI systems can be prone to hallucinations we always recommend readers seek out and read the original source material. Our intention is to help listeners save time and stay on top of trends and new discoveries.
You can find the introductory section of this recording provided below...
This summary is based on the article "Can Large Language Models Explore In-Context?" published in March 2024 by Akshay Krishnamurthy and others, with affiliations to Microsoft Research and Carnegie Mellon University. The paper undertakes an investigation into the capabilities of contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs), such as Gpt-3.5, Gpt-4, and Llama2, to perform exploration tasks intrinsic to reinforcement learning and decision-making without any training interventions. This research probes the native capacities of these models by deploying them as agents within multi-armed bandit (MAB) environments, where the environment's description and the interaction history are fully encapsulated within the LLM prompts themselves.
The core objective was to determine whether these LLMs can exhibit exploration behaviors crucial for decision-making - specifically, whether they can effectively gather information to reduce uncertainty and make informed decisions. To this extent, the study employed various prompt designs to test the models' exploration tendencies. The findings were largely nuanced. It was observed that in most configurations, the LLMs failed to engage in robust exploratory behavior, with only one particular setup (involving Gpt-4, chain-of-thought reasoning, and an externally summarized interaction history) resulting in satisfactory exploration. This outcome underscores the importance of external summarization is facilitating effective exploratory behavior in LLMs, a technique that may not be universally applicable in more complex decision-making contexts.
The paper brings to light the vital insight that while LLMs like Gpt-4 possess the potential for exploration when the prompts are meticulously crafted, the broader application of LLMs as decision-making agents in complex environments still necessitates significant algorithmic interventions. These interventions might include methods like fine-tuning or dataset curation to enrich the LLMs' decision-making capabilities. Essentially, the study articulates a nuanced understanding of LLMs' in-context exploration abilities, emphasizing the necessity for continued research and development to harness these models' full decision-making potential. Through a series of experiments and meticulous prompt engineering, the research offers vital contributions towards understanding the limitations and capabilities of LLMs in reinforcement learning contexts.