So Oakland's broke city government spent five hours and eight employees removing $3,000 worth of citizen-installed speed bumps that actually stopped sideshows for eight months. Makes perfect sense, right? While residents dealt with stolen cars racing through neighborhoods, frightening children and creating chaos, the city ignored four years of complaints—until neighbors took action themselves.We break down how Oakland's Department of Transportation prioritized removing effective DIY safety measures over addressing the actual problem: reckless sideshow participants terrorizing communities. The city claims the speed bumps were a "hazard" while allowing the real hazards—spinning cars, shootings, and mayhem—to return the very next day. Meanwhile, homeless encampments operate without permits, but law-abiding taxpayers get penalized for protecting their neighborhoods.Is this really how cash-strapped Oakland should spend taxpayer money? Why remove solutions that work instead of fast-tracking legal replacements? What does it say when citizens have to choose between following the rules and protecting their families?