Cases and Controversies

Consequential SCOTUS Decisions Lurk in the Shadows

07.17.2020 - By Bloomberg LawPlay

Download our free app to listen on your phone

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

If you were excited about the new five-justice conservative majority, this just-completed term of the Supreme Court might have left you disappointed.

But law professor Stephen Vladeck says that's not the full picture. A look at the so-called "shadow docket"—the work the court does without oral argument—suggests it was a much better term for conservatives and the Trump administration than it might seem.

On the latest episode of Bloomberg Law's Cases and Controversies, hosts Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin lift the veil on some of these consequential yet enigmatic actions. This includes green-lighting President Trump's border wall and refusing to revisit the doctrine of qualified immunity.

More episodes from Cases and Controversies