
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this post Scott Alexander returns to the topic of artistic taste, responding to thoughtful replies from Ozy, Frank Lantz, and Sympathetic Opposition on a piece he wrote last year. He opens by unpacking eight distinct things people tend to bundle together under the heading of "good art" — from raw sensory delight to historical novelty to political point-making — and then sets out to argue, contra his interlocutors, that letting these blur into one another is doing real damage. Along the way he draws on analogies from restaurant criticism, medical research, modern literary fiction, and his own relationship with poetry to defend a particular view of what aesthetic judgment is actually for.
https://open.substack.com/pub/astralcodexten/p/contra-everyone-on-taste?r=67y1h&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
By Readings of great articles in AI voices5
44 ratings
In this post Scott Alexander returns to the topic of artistic taste, responding to thoughtful replies from Ozy, Frank Lantz, and Sympathetic Opposition on a piece he wrote last year. He opens by unpacking eight distinct things people tend to bundle together under the heading of "good art" — from raw sensory delight to historical novelty to political point-making — and then sets out to argue, contra his interlocutors, that letting these blur into one another is doing real damage. Along the way he draws on analogies from restaurant criticism, medical research, modern literary fiction, and his own relationship with poetry to defend a particular view of what aesthetic judgment is actually for.
https://open.substack.com/pub/astralcodexten/p/contra-everyone-on-taste?r=67y1h&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

91,090 Listeners

2,448 Listeners

850 Listeners

112,279 Listeners

214 Listeners

7,248 Listeners

6,450 Listeners

564 Listeners

5,554 Listeners

16,340 Listeners

12 Listeners

691 Listeners

405 Listeners

6 Listeners

1,146 Listeners