Send us a text

Margaret Atwood's chilling vision of a dystopian America transformed into the theocratic Republic of Gilead has captivated readers since 1985, but how does this haunting story translate from page to screen? Diving deep into both the original novel and its acclaimed Hulu adaptation, this episode explores the fascinating creative choices that shape our understanding of Offred's nightmare.

From the stunning watercolor imagery of Renee Nault's graphic novel adaptation to the controversial casting of younger actors as the Commander and Serena Joy, each artistic decision fundamentally alters our perception of Gilead's power dynamics. The television series makes explicit what Atwood merely implies - showing us Janine's eye removal and Ofglen's genital mutilation while expanding character journeys beyond the novel's boundaries.

The most profound differences emerge in how each medium handles hope and resistance. While both end with the same ambiguous cliffhanger of Offred entering a van to an unknown fate, the novel frames her story as historical testimony studied in a post-Gilead future. The series, needing to continue beyond season one, transforms her journey into an ongoing resistance narrative with expanded roles for characters like Moira, who escapes to Canada rather than remaining broken at Jezebel's.

Whether you're a longtime fan of Atwood's prose or discovered this world through Elisabeth Moss's powerful performance, this episode illuminates how different storytelling approaches can reveal different truths about the same cautionary tale. What changes strengthened the adaptation? What was lost in translation? And most importantly - is the book really always better than the adaptation? Listen now and join the conversation about one of our most urgent and relevant dystopian visions.

All episodes of the podcast can be found on our website: https://booksvsmovies.buzzsprout.com/share

Connect with me: Instagram | Threads | Bookshop | Goodreads | Blog