
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


At the EUVC Summit 2025, Anthony Danon from Rerail and Sarah Drinkwater from Common Magic took the stage with what turned out to be one of the most intellectually charged exchanges of the day. The topic? Solo GPs, specialization, and the hard choices that define fund performance.
Letâs just sayâno consensus was reached. But the tension? Thatâs where the insight lived.
The Case for the Solo GP: Pure Alignment, Compounding Advantage
Anthony came in strong:
âBeing a solo GP is the purest form of interest alignment.â
To him, solo GPs arenât a stepping stone or niche playâtheyâre a category in their own right. The advantage? Focus. Speed. Zero overhead. And most importantly: a differentiated product founders want.
He highlighted what he sees as the compounding edge:
* No IC.
* No coordination cost.
* Vertically integrated workflows.
* A position as a complementary node, not a competitor, in the ecosystem.
And yesâthereâs scale in solo too.
âI just had coffee with two solo GPs managing over a billion in AUM. You don't need to âscale upâ to be credible.â
The Performance Perspective: Ops, Fund Size & Market Fit
Sarah offered a more grounded lens: focus on performance over scale.
âYou donât win on good ops aloneâbut you can lose on bad ops.â
Her point: itâs not about copying what works in another market. It's about right-sizing your fund to what your strategy and your market can actually sustain.
Especially in Europe, she argued, the path isnât about chasing a 10x in AUMâitâs about finding the zone where your edge sings.
âIf I think about the funds I admire, they got really good at finding the fund size that matched their true strategy.â
And for emerging managers, the key is still figuring out what the market needs now, not just what worked last cycle.
Two Views. Both True.
As the session wrapped, one line captured the spirit of it all:
âThe test of a great intelligence is holding two opposing ideas at the same time.â
At EUVC, we didnât just hear those ideas.We saw themâsitting side by side on stage.
And if weâre smart about it, we wonât choose one or the other.Weâll connect the dots.
By euđ”vcAt the EUVC Summit 2025, Anthony Danon from Rerail and Sarah Drinkwater from Common Magic took the stage with what turned out to be one of the most intellectually charged exchanges of the day. The topic? Solo GPs, specialization, and the hard choices that define fund performance.
Letâs just sayâno consensus was reached. But the tension? Thatâs where the insight lived.
The Case for the Solo GP: Pure Alignment, Compounding Advantage
Anthony came in strong:
âBeing a solo GP is the purest form of interest alignment.â
To him, solo GPs arenât a stepping stone or niche playâtheyâre a category in their own right. The advantage? Focus. Speed. Zero overhead. And most importantly: a differentiated product founders want.
He highlighted what he sees as the compounding edge:
* No IC.
* No coordination cost.
* Vertically integrated workflows.
* A position as a complementary node, not a competitor, in the ecosystem.
And yesâthereâs scale in solo too.
âI just had coffee with two solo GPs managing over a billion in AUM. You don't need to âscale upâ to be credible.â
The Performance Perspective: Ops, Fund Size & Market Fit
Sarah offered a more grounded lens: focus on performance over scale.
âYou donât win on good ops aloneâbut you can lose on bad ops.â
Her point: itâs not about copying what works in another market. It's about right-sizing your fund to what your strategy and your market can actually sustain.
Especially in Europe, she argued, the path isnât about chasing a 10x in AUMâitâs about finding the zone where your edge sings.
âIf I think about the funds I admire, they got really good at finding the fund size that matched their true strategy.â
And for emerging managers, the key is still figuring out what the market needs now, not just what worked last cycle.
Two Views. Both True.
As the session wrapped, one line captured the spirit of it all:
âThe test of a great intelligence is holding two opposing ideas at the same time.â
At EUVC, we didnât just hear those ideas.We saw themâsitting side by side on stage.
And if weâre smart about it, we wonât choose one or the other.Weâll connect the dots.