So many are under the strange belief that there is something terrible about not owning the house in which you live.

So we massively subsidize home ownership, and try to actively interfere with renting.

Except when we do rent control, which turns renting into a form of owning, and allows us to take real property and de facto give it to current renters.

A lot of this is pure attempts to punish and exclude the poor. If you can’t afford a downpayment, we don’t want you living here. Go away.

Some of it is the belief that when you rent, you are being ‘taken advantage of’ and that such a deal could not possibly be fair.

Some of it is that if you don’t own, you don’t have the incentive to drive up property values. Which means you won’t properly work to ‘improve’ your local area, especially that you won’t conspire to block housing.

The result of this is that if you’re not willing to commit to living in one place for years, or you can’t afford a down payment, you get punished, and punished hard.

Owning Versus Renting

The graph [...]

---

Outline:

(01:08) Owning Versus Renting

(03:11) Build To Rent Is Good Actually

(08:16) Elizabeth Warren, Full Supervillain

(09:44) The Better Case Against Corporate Housing Ownership

(11:50) The ROAD Act Bans Building And Then Renting Houses

(14:17) Rental Covenants

(15:09) Extended Eviction Delay After Nonpayment Is Mostly Bad

(16:51) Los Angeles Renting

(19:30) Sufficiently Advanced Rent Control Is Indistinguishable From Ownership

(23:05) England Tries To Ban Renting

(24:36) Claude Rental Discounts

---

First published:

Source:

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.