Oral Argument

Episode 160: In the Barrel

01.27.2018 - By Joe Miller and Christian TurnerPlay

Download our free app to listen on your phone

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Steve Vladeck rejoins us on the law of civilian-military separation, whether Marbury v. Madison was rightly decided, and how his recent oral argument before the Supreme Court went (spoiler: amazingly but weirdly). (Ignore Christian's use of the term "basises" (wtf?) and other misstatements and inanities ... you try recording ever week between classes....)

This show’s links:

Steve Vladeck’s faculty profile and academic writing

The National Security Law Podcast 54: Family Ties or Family Matters?

First Mondays OT2017 #12: False Idol (guest Steve Vladeck)

SCOTUSblog page for Dalmazzi v. United States (including links to all the briefs and more)

The oral argument: Oyez version, SCOTUS downloads, and transcript

Oral Argument 137: Steve Vladeck Pincer Move (where we discussed Dalmazzi at the cert stage)

Burns v. Wilson

Marbury v. Madison

William Baude, Exciting Developments in Supreme Court Appellate Jurisdiction:

Some Would Call It the Second Coming of Marbury v. Madison

United States v. Coe

ex parte Bollman and Swartwout

Akhil Amar, Marbury, Section 13, and the Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Louise Weinberg, Our Marbury

Felker v. Turpin; see also Oral Argument 84: Felker's Chickens

United States v. Gray

Special Guest: Steve Vladeck.

More episodes from Oral Argument