In this episode of In That Case, Shook attorney Henry Adams discusses Ohio v. EPA, a case examining the EPA’s authority under the Clean Air Act and its regulation of interstate pollution through the Good Neighbor Rule. The conversation explores the legal and procedural challenges surrounding the EPA’s rejection of multiple state implementation plans (SIPs) and the subsequent federal implementation plan (FIP) and the broader implications for administrative law and agency power. The hosts break down key arguments from the majority and dissenting opinions, highlighting the complexities of regulatory decision-making and judicial oversight.

Case: Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency

Click here to learn more about Shook attorney Henry Adams.

Click here to learn more about Shook's Orange County office.

Please follow us on social media at:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/shook-hardy-&-bacon/

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2CCKQXQ2BCWaBr29mAwWiQ

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/shookhardybacon/

www.shb.com