
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Of all the Robin Hoods that have come and gone, at least one of them wondrously zestful -- that's Errol Flynn's -- and one of them was woefully zonked -- that's Kevin Costner's. Up to now, the only absurd one has been Mel Brooks's send-up, "Robin Hood: Men in Tights." Yet Ridley Scott's new version achieves an absurdity all its own. It's an ersatz epic about men in fights -- grim fights, grinding battles, clanking combats that are repetitive and, in a movie that runs 140 minutes, almost endless. Russell Crowe fights a losing battle against Brian Helgeland's turgid script, and the production's almost total, and truly absurd, absence of fun.
By KCRW4.1
155155 ratings
Of all the Robin Hoods that have come and gone, at least one of them wondrously zestful -- that's Errol Flynn's -- and one of them was woefully zonked -- that's Kevin Costner's. Up to now, the only absurd one has been Mel Brooks's send-up, "Robin Hood: Men in Tights." Yet Ridley Scott's new version achieves an absurdity all its own. It's an ersatz epic about men in fights -- grim fights, grinding battles, clanking combats that are repetitive and, in a movie that runs 140 minutes, almost endless. Russell Crowe fights a losing battle against Brian Helgeland's turgid script, and the production's almost total, and truly absurd, absence of fun.

11,487 Listeners

574 Listeners

5,098 Listeners

1,280 Listeners

3,948 Listeners

611 Listeners

661 Listeners

2,431 Listeners

992 Listeners

311 Listeners

1,097 Listeners

537 Listeners

329 Listeners

1,101 Listeners

735 Listeners

152 Listeners

730 Listeners

4,726 Listeners

1,905 Listeners

82 Listeners

1,085 Listeners

106 Listeners

120 Listeners