Two universities defended their admissions process before the Supreme Court on Monday. Starting with the University of North Carolina (with a Harvard tease), David and Sarah grapple with – and at times disagree about – the difficult questions at the heart of the hearing: how should we understand diversity? Is seeking justice for centuries of slavery and discrimination compatible with race neutrality? Who should bear the brunt of righting a historic wrong?

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

SCOTUS Considers Affirmative Action

Advisory Opinions is a new podcast from The Dispatch. Hosts David French and Sarah Isgur have a weekly conversation about the law, culture, and why it matters.

News

Politics

There’s not much worth discussing yet in Donald Trump’s criminal trial in New York, so Sarah and David focus on the Supreme Court and a case on Idaho’s law restricting gender-transition treatment for minors. Plus: Murmurs about Clarence Thomas’ brief absence.
The Agenda:
—Election law crimes, tax crimes, and falsification of business records
—Challenges of broad injunctions
—Idaho’s Vulnerable Child Protection Act
—SCOTUS exhausted with emergency docket applications
—Justices call to retire universal injunctions
—January 6 arguments before SCOTUS
—SCOTUS declines to intervene in a police lawsuit against a Black Lives Matter activist
—Obstructions in official proceedings
—Legal issues in the Iran-Israel conflict
Show Notes:
—Labrador v. Poe
—Counterman v. Colorado
—18 U.S. Code § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Retire Universal Injunctions

Co-authors Jack Goldsmith and Bob Bauer join the podcast to discuss their book, After Trump: Reconstructing the Presidency, and the need to reform presidential power. But first, a protest and a dinner party at a Berkeley Law School dean's house. Did the location qualify as a public forum? Sarah and David evaluate.
The Agenda:
—Dean of Berkeley Law School and a Palestinian Protest: 1A protection?
—How to go about civil disobedience
—Reforming the Insurrection Act
—The need for bipartisan support in reforming presidential powers
—Did Donald Trump abuse the pardon power as president?
—Special counsels and the fear of rigging prosecutions
Show Notes:
—The Logan Act
—The American Law Institute
—David's Sunday column
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Enormous Powers of the President

Sarah and David explain the jury questionnaire in Alvin Bragg’s case against Donald Trump before getting into the weeds of the origins of originalism.
The Agenda:
—How to select a jury for Trump
—Celebrity trial jury instructions
—Biden swings again at student loan forgiveness
—Did the Warren court birth originalism?
—Originalism vs. platonic idealism
—More questions from a high schooler
—How do judicial ethics actually work?
—The myth of the 6-3 court
—The most important SCOTUS decisions
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Real Originalism Has Never Been Tried

Things get heated in Trump’s classified documents case. In a court filing this week in Donald Trump’s classified documents case, special counsel Jack Smith challenged Judge Aileen Cannon by vowing to appeal any decision that included the Presidential Record Act in jury instructions. David and Sarah discuss Smith's public move and what it means for the case.
The Agenda:
—Sarah's recaps her defamation law musical experience
—Justice Sotomayor's age raises questions about the right time for Justices to retire
—Is Trump's defense counsel actually good?
—Jack Smith's frustration with Judge Aileen Cannon
—Answering questions from high school students
—Yes, we're still discussing work-life balance
Show Notes:
—Presidential Records Act
—New York Times Company v. Sullivan
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Jack Smith Scolds Judge

Sarah and David dive into two op-eds challenging the Federalist Society and the call for lawyers to uphold the tradition of liberty under law.
The Agenda:
—Mayfield v. Butler, retaliation, and political targeting
—Risks and challenges facing the Federalist Society
—Did Trump-era advances in jurisprudence come at a deep civic cost?
—The Thomas’ article on the judicial filibuster
—Will Peter Navarro’s attempts to evade jail time succeed? (Spoiler: No)
—Sarah and David answer work-life balance questions
Show Notes:
—Villareal v. City of Laredo
—Gonzalez v. Trevino
—Justice Breyer's bookshelf
—Advisory Opinions podcast on Federal Judges visiting Israel
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

SCOTUS Considers Affirmative Action

Download our free app to listen on your phone