Oral Argument

Episode 146: Somehow in the Middle

09.24.2017 - By Joe Miller and Christian TurnerPlay

Download our free app to listen on your phone

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

With Charles Barzun, we discuss Justice Souter and the nature of legal justification. But we take the long way around to get there, starting with some of Souter’s opinions, moving on to philosophy – the nature of moral reasoning and its relation to fact and intuition – and then back to legal theory and Charles’s insight concerning Justice Souter’s jurisprudence.

This show’s links:

Charles Barzun’s faculty profile and writing

Charles Barzun, Justice Souter’s Common Law

Justice Souter’s discussion of Plessy and the role of history in judging (watch from minute one until about minute fourteen) and his Harvard Commencement speech on Plessy

Some Souter opinions Joe loves: Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Markman v. Westview Instruments, and California Dental Assoc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Old Chief v. United States; Oyez’s Old Chief page, including links to the oral argument and hand-down

Planned Parenthood v. Casey; Oyez’s Casey page, including links to the oral argument and hand-down

John Burnett, Border Patrol Arrests Parents While Infant Awaits Serious Operation

Noah Feldman’s Constitution Day interview of Justice Souter

Special Guest: Charles Barzun.

More episodes from Oral Argument