
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The United Arab Emirates is identified in the sources as the principal external enabler of the Rapid Support Forces in Sudan, providing extensive material support that fuels the RSF’s genocidal war. This involvement is not arbitrary but represents a calculated strategy aimed at state capture and comprehensive resource exploitation.
The primary geopolitical driver for the UAE's involvement is its region-wide ideological opposition to political Islam, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood, which it perceives as a threat to its own monarchical system. The UAE views elements within the Sudanese Armed Forces as having ties to Islamists. Following this doctrine, Abu Dhabi supports autocratic non-state actors, such as Khalifa Haftar in Libya and the RSF in Sudan, to counter Islamist influence and popular democratic movements.
The UAE’s military and logistical backing has transformed the RSF into a sophisticated paramilitary army capable of high-intensity warfare and sustaining its campaign of genocide.
The UAE employs a dual-use logistical strategy, using high-profile humanitarian aid pledges and field hospital claims as a "humanitarian alibi" to cover covert arms shipments.
The UAE is engaged in a sophisticated diplomatic double-game. While publicly rejecting all claims of involvement and participating in peace forums, this strategy provides plausible deniability to its allies and media, while it continues to be the decisive military patron of the RSF. This behavior persists because the international community’s failure to hold the UAE accountable, due to Western strategic and economic dependence, has effectively granted it a "free pass" for enabling mass atrocities.
By Global ReporterThe United Arab Emirates is identified in the sources as the principal external enabler of the Rapid Support Forces in Sudan, providing extensive material support that fuels the RSF’s genocidal war. This involvement is not arbitrary but represents a calculated strategy aimed at state capture and comprehensive resource exploitation.
The primary geopolitical driver for the UAE's involvement is its region-wide ideological opposition to political Islam, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood, which it perceives as a threat to its own monarchical system. The UAE views elements within the Sudanese Armed Forces as having ties to Islamists. Following this doctrine, Abu Dhabi supports autocratic non-state actors, such as Khalifa Haftar in Libya and the RSF in Sudan, to counter Islamist influence and popular democratic movements.
The UAE’s military and logistical backing has transformed the RSF into a sophisticated paramilitary army capable of high-intensity warfare and sustaining its campaign of genocide.
The UAE employs a dual-use logistical strategy, using high-profile humanitarian aid pledges and field hospital claims as a "humanitarian alibi" to cover covert arms shipments.
The UAE is engaged in a sophisticated diplomatic double-game. While publicly rejecting all claims of involvement and participating in peace forums, this strategy provides plausible deniability to its allies and media, while it continues to be the decisive military patron of the RSF. This behavior persists because the international community’s failure to hold the UAE accountable, due to Western strategic and economic dependence, has effectively granted it a "free pass" for enabling mass atrocities.