The Philosophy of Crime

503: The Alford Plea – Pleading Guilty When You’re Innocent

05.04.2022 - By James RennerPlay

Download our free app to listen on your phone

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

The Alford Plea provides a way for a defended to plead guilty while maintaining their innocence. Should this be allowed in criminal court? Where did it come from? Who benefits?

Covered Topics: The West Memphis 3, Henry Alford, Act Utilitarianism, Jeremy Benthem

Further Reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alford_plea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Memphis_Three#Release https://www.reuters.com/article/us-crime-westmemphis3-arkansas/after-18-years-west-memphis-3-go-free-on-plea-deal-idUSTRE77I54A20110819 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism#Utility_ignores_justice https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVltykvceWw https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Bentham https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_utilitarianism https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/1970/70-14_10-14-1970.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KG3zGzY2hsk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Carolina_v._Alford https://www.delgazette.com/opinion/24467/david-hejmanowski-the-lasting-legacy-of-henry-alford https://www.oxygen.com/crime-time/then-now-the-west-memphis-three Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

More episodes from The Philosophy of Crime