
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Gospel of John is a very intriguing book. It is radically different from the other three, referred to as the Synoptic Gospels. The meaning of the word synoptic can be broken down to “syn” (together) and “optic” (seen). Literally “seen together”. In other words, you can place them side by side and see the similarity in format, style, and content.
Such is not the case with the Gospel of John. From the onset, in John, Jesus is seen as the “Cosmic Christ”--one with God before time began. It is much more reflective and theological than the narrative-driven Synoptic Gospels. It also includes the “I AM” statements that are frequently quoted in traditional churches. These are not found in the other three gospels. Why? We will see.
From the Unity angle of metaphysical interpretation, the Gospel of John is seen as more spiritual. It is the only Gospel Unity Co-Founder Charles Fillmore wrote a book about.
By rev. tomas de león5
44 ratings
The Gospel of John is a very intriguing book. It is radically different from the other three, referred to as the Synoptic Gospels. The meaning of the word synoptic can be broken down to “syn” (together) and “optic” (seen). Literally “seen together”. In other words, you can place them side by side and see the similarity in format, style, and content.
Such is not the case with the Gospel of John. From the onset, in John, Jesus is seen as the “Cosmic Christ”--one with God before time began. It is much more reflective and theological than the narrative-driven Synoptic Gospels. It also includes the “I AM” statements that are frequently quoted in traditional churches. These are not found in the other three gospels. Why? We will see.
From the Unity angle of metaphysical interpretation, the Gospel of John is seen as more spiritual. It is the only Gospel Unity Co-Founder Charles Fillmore wrote a book about.