
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Summary
LLMs are better at developing crystallized intelligence than fluid intelligence. That is: LLM training is good at building crystallized intelligence by learning patterns from training data, and this is sufficient to make them surprisingly skillful at lots of tasks. But for a given capability level in the areas they’ve trained on, LLMs have very weak fluid intelligence compared to humans. For example, two years ago I thought human-level SAT performance would mean AGI, but turns out LLMs can do great at the SAT while being mediocre at lots of other tasks.
I’m not saying LLMs are just parrots (that's dumb).[1] There's a continuity between crystallized and fluid intelligence.
---
Outline:
(00:10) Summary
(02:47) Implications for AI futures
(04:54) We should check if this is true!
(05:44) Modeling worlds where AI progress is hungry for domain data
(06:15) What types of areas see progress in this model?
(09:38) There are also stories for how advanced AIs could route around data bottlenecks:
(10:36) Which concrete domains see progress?
(12:03) Implications for AI takeoff
(12:08) While it lasts, weak fluid intelligence is great news for alignment risk
(12:58) A key bifurcation point: can AIs revolutionize AI R&D, or merely speed it up?
(14:51) Is this the world we live in?
(16:09) How can we test this hypothesis?
The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
Source:
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
By LessWrongSummary
LLMs are better at developing crystallized intelligence than fluid intelligence. That is: LLM training is good at building crystallized intelligence by learning patterns from training data, and this is sufficient to make them surprisingly skillful at lots of tasks. But for a given capability level in the areas they’ve trained on, LLMs have very weak fluid intelligence compared to humans. For example, two years ago I thought human-level SAT performance would mean AGI, but turns out LLMs can do great at the SAT while being mediocre at lots of other tasks.
I’m not saying LLMs are just parrots (that's dumb).[1] There's a continuity between crystallized and fluid intelligence.
---
Outline:
(00:10) Summary
(02:47) Implications for AI futures
(04:54) We should check if this is true!
(05:44) Modeling worlds where AI progress is hungry for domain data
(06:15) What types of areas see progress in this model?
(09:38) There are also stories for how advanced AIs could route around data bottlenecks:
(10:36) Which concrete domains see progress?
(12:03) Implications for AI takeoff
(12:08) While it lasts, weak fluid intelligence is great news for alignment risk
(12:58) A key bifurcation point: can AIs revolutionize AI R&D, or merely speed it up?
(14:51) Is this the world we live in?
(16:09) How can we test this hypothesis?
The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
Source:
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

112,330 Listeners

130 Listeners

7,247 Listeners

563 Listeners

16,328 Listeners

4 Listeners

14 Listeners

2 Listeners