🦄 Atheism is a Valid and Strong Position


These two articles by Jorge Guerra Pires, PhD, a writer for Scientists Free From Religion, present a robust critique of arguments used to defend theism, particularly targeting the views of physicist Michio Kaku. The first source argues that atheism is a valid and strong intellectual position, directly challenging Kaku's assertion that atheism is "not scientific" and criticizing his use of analogies like the unicorn and Bertrand Russell's teapot; Pires aligns instead with Richard Dawkins, positing that the question of God is a scientific one and emphasizing the ethical difference between belief in a unicorn and consequential religious belief. The second source expands on this by directly challenging the common refrain, "You cannot disprove God," arguing that while an abstract, unfalsifiable God cannot be proven false, the specific, testable attributes of the Abrahamic God (such as answering prayer or literal creation) have been empirically disproven by science, citing examples like the STEP prayer experiment and modern cosmology, while also employing the satirical Flying Spaghetti Monster argument to illustrate the absurdity of accepting unsupported claims. Both sources stress that the burden of proof lies with the claimant, and that many famous scientific figures, including Einstein, did not endorse a personal God.

==
Read more: “You cannot disprove God” — I beg to disagree!

Welcome

This publication focus on atheism, but with a scientific touch.

Learn more