<p>In episode 2, Sandy and Cory discuss the "Imprecision Hypothesis of Chronic Pain" recently published by Lorimer Moseley and Johan Vlaeyen. Potential clinical implications are discussed as well as a rebuttal that has already been submitted. Hard hitting questions are tackled, like "Is pain a stimulus or a response?", "How does associative learning apply to clinical treatment?", and "Does Cory have the mental fortitude to beat a 5 year old in Battleship?"</p>

In episode 2, Sandy and Cory discuss the "Imprecision Hypothesis of Chronic Pain" recently published by Lorimer Moseley and Johan Vlaeyen. Potential clinical implications are discussed as well as a rebuttal that has already been submitted. Hard hitting questions are tackled, like "Is pain a stimulus or a response?", "How does associative learning apply to clinical treatment?", and "Does Cory have the mental fortitude to beat a 5 year old in Battleship?"

002 New Theory of Chronic Pain

Join co-hosts Sandy Hilton and Cory Blickenstaff, physical therapists who are "in the trenches" practicing in unique settings on opposite sides of United States, as they discuss current research and topics of pain science. Listen in on occasional interviews of the prominent figures of pain science. Focus will be on making the information meaningful to practice in the clinic.

Share 002 New Theory of Chronic Pain

Sign up to save your podcasts

002 New Theory of Chronic Pain

002 New Theory of Chronic Pain