
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Today's episode explores how we can take the "easy" road by broadening our view.
Let's start with the problem
We see the world through a flawed lens. There are a million terms for this idea: "target fixation," "missing the forest for the trees," "anchoring," "framing." The list goes on.
The point is—we get so used to "the rules of the game" that we miss it when the game changes.
David Kilcullen explores this idea in fascinating detail in The Dragons and the Snakes. If you're into geopolitics, check out Episode 023 with David. The TL;DR version of the book is that success can breed failure. Since the West dominated the traditional battlefield, its enemies found new ways to fight. China embraced a much wider view of war, including economic, legal, and technological avenues to fight the West. David called this tactic conceptual envelopment. Similarly, the Russians have sidestepped traditional battlefield confrontations by "surfing the edge," as David would say, of confrontation. The Russians blur the lines and exploit the slow reaction times of Western powers.
The takeaway: don't get mired in the old way of fighting.
In my recent episode with Brian DeChesare, a similar concept comes up at the very end. He mentions that very driven people tend to confine themselves to options (a, b, c) when there are many more that exist. We get sucked into optimizing for the wrong thing, and we grind away for trivial gains while leaving the critical variables unexamined.
Hollywood gives an awesome false frame example in the Dark Knight. Batman's butler, Alfred, tells the story of his search for a jewel thief in Burma. Alfred and his team search the villages and black markets for the stolen jewels—all to no avail. Until they find a child playing with a huge ruby. They realized that the "thief" wasn't a thief at all. He was throwing the stones away because he just wanted to cause chaos. Once they realized that the problem was different, they could pivot and make real progress. Their false assumption caused a lot of wasted effort.
For a more real-life example, there's a funny Harvard Business Review article by Peter Bregman where a "sibling fighting problem" is reframed as a "morning crankiness problem." The link is in the show notes https://hbr.org/2015/12/are-you-solving-the-wrong-problem. It turned out that the solution was orange juice rather than a lecture on the golden rule.
If we find ourselves grinding away without making progress, it can be a good time to try to rethink our assumptions. But this is way easier said than done.
So what's the solution?
If it's possible that our assumptions are wrong, we need to take a moment to consider what we might think is goofy. If convention isn't working, it's time to start breaking the rules—if only as a thought experiment.
So here are some questions to ask and threads to pull:
Hopefully these questions help explore new avenues and wider perspectives on the challenges at hand.
Until next week—thanks for listening.
Support Links
Rate and review the podcast at https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/strategy-chain/id1492935567
Find Amazon affiliate links at http://strategychainpodcast.com/support
Send me questions at http://strategychainpodcast.com/contact
Sign up for the email list at http://strategychainpodcast.com/
Social Media @strategychain (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Medium)
By Michael RobersonToday's episode explores how we can take the "easy" road by broadening our view.
Let's start with the problem
We see the world through a flawed lens. There are a million terms for this idea: "target fixation," "missing the forest for the trees," "anchoring," "framing." The list goes on.
The point is—we get so used to "the rules of the game" that we miss it when the game changes.
David Kilcullen explores this idea in fascinating detail in The Dragons and the Snakes. If you're into geopolitics, check out Episode 023 with David. The TL;DR version of the book is that success can breed failure. Since the West dominated the traditional battlefield, its enemies found new ways to fight. China embraced a much wider view of war, including economic, legal, and technological avenues to fight the West. David called this tactic conceptual envelopment. Similarly, the Russians have sidestepped traditional battlefield confrontations by "surfing the edge," as David would say, of confrontation. The Russians blur the lines and exploit the slow reaction times of Western powers.
The takeaway: don't get mired in the old way of fighting.
In my recent episode with Brian DeChesare, a similar concept comes up at the very end. He mentions that very driven people tend to confine themselves to options (a, b, c) when there are many more that exist. We get sucked into optimizing for the wrong thing, and we grind away for trivial gains while leaving the critical variables unexamined.
Hollywood gives an awesome false frame example in the Dark Knight. Batman's butler, Alfred, tells the story of his search for a jewel thief in Burma. Alfred and his team search the villages and black markets for the stolen jewels—all to no avail. Until they find a child playing with a huge ruby. They realized that the "thief" wasn't a thief at all. He was throwing the stones away because he just wanted to cause chaos. Once they realized that the problem was different, they could pivot and make real progress. Their false assumption caused a lot of wasted effort.
For a more real-life example, there's a funny Harvard Business Review article by Peter Bregman where a "sibling fighting problem" is reframed as a "morning crankiness problem." The link is in the show notes https://hbr.org/2015/12/are-you-solving-the-wrong-problem. It turned out that the solution was orange juice rather than a lecture on the golden rule.
If we find ourselves grinding away without making progress, it can be a good time to try to rethink our assumptions. But this is way easier said than done.
So what's the solution?
If it's possible that our assumptions are wrong, we need to take a moment to consider what we might think is goofy. If convention isn't working, it's time to start breaking the rules—if only as a thought experiment.
So here are some questions to ask and threads to pull:
Hopefully these questions help explore new avenues and wider perspectives on the challenges at hand.
Until next week—thanks for listening.
Support Links
Rate and review the podcast at https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/strategy-chain/id1492935567
Find Amazon affiliate links at http://strategychainpodcast.com/support
Send me questions at http://strategychainpodcast.com/contact
Sign up for the email list at http://strategychainpodcast.com/
Social Media @strategychain (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Medium)