
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


To support us on Patreon, go to patreon.com/twomancongress and join a tier!
In this episode, Chad discusses Liebeck v. Mcdonald's. This case is famous for the compensation Ms. Liebeck received for her injuries from hot coffee.
Although not related to Constitutional law, this case serves as a reminder of how the actions of one party may influence judicial decisions.
We hope you enjoy this episode. Please leave us a 5-star rating and review.
By William and ChadTo support us on Patreon, go to patreon.com/twomancongress and join a tier!
In this episode, Chad discusses Liebeck v. Mcdonald's. This case is famous for the compensation Ms. Liebeck received for her injuries from hot coffee.
Although not related to Constitutional law, this case serves as a reminder of how the actions of one party may influence judicial decisions.
We hope you enjoy this episode. Please leave us a 5-star rating and review.