Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share 06 The Grounds for Possession. (BBPO Para’s 28-52).
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
06 The Grounds for Possession. (BBPO Para’s 28-52).
The Defence of Barclays Possession Order - Para's 28-52.
This section includes para’s 5 to 9 of the original UK’s Defence of a Possession Order. Everybody is going to have different views on its terms, but one has to assume Barclays simply desiring the loans immediate repayment, may not be enough. As they have used deception to infer there are arrears and conflict with the borrower. When the borrow has in fact now provided over 30,000 words of detail on their situation.
And all the interest, as agreed in the loan is paid. Barclays have decided to designate the principal capital sum as arrears, when of course it is the principal capital sum, as it has been for 26 years.
And Barclays has a process in place that to an outsider may appear they mean to assist, when they don’t. They fabricate what they think others will fall for. When Barclays own letters show that to be the case. I liken such a situation to the Post Office scandal, where it appears that UK Judges accept whatever a solicitor puts in front of them... I’ve news for the many, that is precisely what does occur, well lets see what occurs in the instance.
This section also covers detail on the:
Equality Act 2010 (para 45).
The Perjury Act of 1911 (para 49).
The Fraud Act of 2006 (para 50).
All of which Barclays have breached, and the detail of how, and why is clear. The question is, will such be clear to a Judge.. ?? Who give the public the perception they are the holders of knowledge and wisdom, well lets see.
Kevin Lamin.
View all episodes
By Kevin LaminThe Defence of Barclays Possession Order - Para's 28-52.
This section includes para’s 5 to 9 of the original UK’s Defence of a Possession Order. Everybody is going to have different views on its terms, but one has to assume Barclays simply desiring the loans immediate repayment, may not be enough. As they have used deception to infer there are arrears and conflict with the borrower. When the borrow has in fact now provided over 30,000 words of detail on their situation.
And all the interest, as agreed in the loan is paid. Barclays have decided to designate the principal capital sum as arrears, when of course it is the principal capital sum, as it has been for 26 years.
And Barclays has a process in place that to an outsider may appear they mean to assist, when they don’t. They fabricate what they think others will fall for. When Barclays own letters show that to be the case. I liken such a situation to the Post Office scandal, where it appears that UK Judges accept whatever a solicitor puts in front of them... I’ve news for the many, that is precisely what does occur, well lets see what occurs in the instance.
This section also covers detail on the:
Equality Act 2010 (para 45).
The Perjury Act of 1911 (para 49).
The Fraud Act of 2006 (para 50).
All of which Barclays have breached, and the detail of how, and why is clear. The question is, will such be clear to a Judge.. ?? Who give the public the perception they are the holders of knowledge and wisdom, well lets see.
Kevin Lamin.