What is an asset actually worth if you had to sell it today? 💰📉

In this episode 🎙️, we decode the fair value puzzle under IFRS 13.

We step away from historical cost 🧾 and into market-based exit prices — whether you’re valuing land in Riyadh 🏗️🇸🇦 or a complex financial derivative 📊.

IFRS 13 doesn’t tell you when to use fair value — other standards do that.

But it tells you how to measure it. And that “how” is everything.

⸻

Key subjects covered in this episode:

• The Exit Price Notion 🚪

Fair value = the price received to sell an asset (or paid to transfer a liability).

Not entry price. Not replacement cost.

Exit. From a market participant’s perspective.

⸻

• The Unit of Account 🧩

Are we valuing:

• A single asset?

• A cash-generating unit?

• A portfolio?

The standard you’re applying determines the unit — not IFRS 13 itself.

⸻

• The Principal Market 🌍

Use the principal market (highest volume and activity).

If none exists → use the most advantageous market.

But always consider transaction and transport costs properly.

⸻

• The Fair Value Hierarchy 🏗️

The famous three levels that examiners love:

• Level 1 🥇: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

• Level 2 🥈: Observable inputs other than Level 1 (e.g., similar assets, yield curves).

• Level 3 🥉: Unobservable inputs (management assumptions, projections).

Transparency increases as subjectivity increases.

⸻

• Valuation Techniques 📐

Three approaches:

• Market Approach 📊

• Cost Approach 🏗️

• Income Approach 💸

Technique doesn’t determine hierarchy level — inputs do.

⸻

• Highest and Best Use 🏢➡️🏙️

For non-financial assets, fair value reflects the asset’s maximum economic potential — even if you aren’t currently using it that way.

Land used as a warehouse today might be valued as future residential property if that’s its highest and best use.

⸻

🔥 A Pro-Tip for your SOCPA Prep

The hierarchy level depends on inputs, not method 🚨.

If you use a mix of inputs, the entire measurement is classified at the lowest level that is significant to the overall valuation.

Example:

If your valuation uses mostly observable data but relies significantly on one unobservable assumption → it becomes Level 3.

This is a classic MCQ trap 🎯.

Fair value is about market perspective, disciplined inputs, and transparent disclosure.

Miss the input hierarchy, and the whole answer falls apart.