Danielle is an atheist and José is a theist, but he feels bad about

believing in something for which he does not have evidence. Given all of

the warfare and destruction in the name of God, is it morally wrong to hold

this belief without sufficient evidence? José outlines an argument by

William James, which attempts to justify belief in God as a special and

specific kind of belief that one can hold by pure will. Is it enough to

convince Danielle?