Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share #14: Does the jury's use of technology to enhance visual acuity result in experimentation and juror misconduct?
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
#14: Does the jury's use of technology to enhance visual acuity result in experimentation and juror misconduct?
State v. Dulin, No. 1 CA-CR 18-0044, 2018 WL 6217154 (Ariz. Ct. App. Nov. 29, 2018).
Nilgun Aykent Zahour & SM JUROR analyze the juror misconduct issues in State v. Dulin, No. 1 CA-CR 18-0044, 2018 WL 6217154 (Ariz. Ct. App. Nov. 29, 2018).
The issue we're going to discuss is whether the jury's use of a laptop to "zoom in" on surveillance photos amounts to experimentation and juror misconduct.
View all episodes
By Nilgun Aykent Zahour: SM JUROR Attorney & Juror Misconduct Legal StrategistState v. Dulin, No. 1 CA-CR 18-0044, 2018 WL 6217154 (Ariz. Ct. App. Nov. 29, 2018).
Nilgun Aykent Zahour & SM JUROR analyze the juror misconduct issues in State v. Dulin, No. 1 CA-CR 18-0044, 2018 WL 6217154 (Ariz. Ct. App. Nov. 29, 2018).
The issue we're going to discuss is whether the jury's use of a laptop to "zoom in" on surveillance photos amounts to experimentation and juror misconduct.