
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Near-Death Experiences
Some of the most popular modern arguments to “prove” the theory of
the natural immortality of the soul are “near-death experiences.” In his
book Life After Life: The Investigation of a Phenomenon—Survival of
Bodily Death (Atlanta, GA: Mockingbird, 1975), Raymond A. Moody,
Jr., presented the results of his five-year study of more than one hun-
dred people who experienced “clinical death” and were revived. These
individuals claimed to have seen a loving and warm being of light
before coming back to life. This has been regarded as “exciting evi-
dence of the survival of the human spirit beyond death” (back cover).
Over the years, many other similar books have been published, promot-
ing the same idea. (See lesson 2.)
Read the resurrection accounts of 1 Kings 17:22–24, 2 Kings 4:34–37,
Mark 5:41–43, Luke 7:14–17, and John 11:40–44. How many of
them talk about any kind of conscious existence while the resur-
rected ones were dead, and why is that answer important?
All near-death experiences reported in modern literature are of people
considered clinically dead, but not really dead, in contrast to Lazarus, who
was dead for four days and whose corpse was rotting (John 11:39). Neither
Lazarus nor any of those raised from the dead in biblical times ever men-
tioned any afterlife experience, whether in Paradise, in purgatory, or in hell.
This is, indeed, an argument from silence, but it is in full agreement with
the biblical teachings on the unconscious state of the dead!
But what about the near-death experiences so commonly recounted
today? If we accept the biblical teaching of the unconsciousness of the dead
(Job 3:11–13, Ps. 115:17, Ps. 146:4, Eccles. 9:10), then we are left with
two main possibilities: either it is a natural psychochemical hallucination
under extreme conditions, or it can be a supernatural, satanic, deceptive
experience (2 Cor. 11:14). Satanic deception could indeed be the explana-
tion, especially because in some cases, these people claim to have talked to
their dead relatives! But it could be a combination of both factors.
With this deception prevalent, and so convincing to many, it is cru-
cial that we stick firmly to the teaching of the Word of God, despite
whatever experiences we or others might have that go against what the
Bible teaches.
How fascinating that NDEs often now come with the imprimatur
of “science.” What does this teach us about how careful we need
to be even of things that science supposedly “proves”?
By Believes Unasp5
22 ratings
Near-Death Experiences
Some of the most popular modern arguments to “prove” the theory of
the natural immortality of the soul are “near-death experiences.” In his
book Life After Life: The Investigation of a Phenomenon—Survival of
Bodily Death (Atlanta, GA: Mockingbird, 1975), Raymond A. Moody,
Jr., presented the results of his five-year study of more than one hun-
dred people who experienced “clinical death” and were revived. These
individuals claimed to have seen a loving and warm being of light
before coming back to life. This has been regarded as “exciting evi-
dence of the survival of the human spirit beyond death” (back cover).
Over the years, many other similar books have been published, promot-
ing the same idea. (See lesson 2.)
Read the resurrection accounts of 1 Kings 17:22–24, 2 Kings 4:34–37,
Mark 5:41–43, Luke 7:14–17, and John 11:40–44. How many of
them talk about any kind of conscious existence while the resur-
rected ones were dead, and why is that answer important?
All near-death experiences reported in modern literature are of people
considered clinically dead, but not really dead, in contrast to Lazarus, who
was dead for four days and whose corpse was rotting (John 11:39). Neither
Lazarus nor any of those raised from the dead in biblical times ever men-
tioned any afterlife experience, whether in Paradise, in purgatory, or in hell.
This is, indeed, an argument from silence, but it is in full agreement with
the biblical teachings on the unconscious state of the dead!
But what about the near-death experiences so commonly recounted
today? If we accept the biblical teaching of the unconsciousness of the dead
(Job 3:11–13, Ps. 115:17, Ps. 146:4, Eccles. 9:10), then we are left with
two main possibilities: either it is a natural psychochemical hallucination
under extreme conditions, or it can be a supernatural, satanic, deceptive
experience (2 Cor. 11:14). Satanic deception could indeed be the explana-
tion, especially because in some cases, these people claim to have talked to
their dead relatives! But it could be a combination of both factors.
With this deception prevalent, and so convincing to many, it is cru-
cial that we stick firmly to the teaching of the Word of God, despite
whatever experiences we or others might have that go against what the
Bible teaches.
How fascinating that NDEs often now come with the imprimatur
of “science.” What does this teach us about how careful we need
to be even of things that science supposedly “proves”?