📺 Watch this episode on YouTube
Dima and Slava have read "The Culture Map" by Erin Meyer and discuss what they think of and how they to dimensions of communication offered by the book.
You can now also subscribe to Biweeklycast on Spotify.
"The Culture Map" by Erin MeyerDima's distinction between "complimentary" and "contradictory" bookBook builds on experience rather that compiles scientific research. This, probably, makes it more honestOne sentence summary: idea of cultural dimensions is useful and, as often, everything is relativeNegative feedback, as narrower aspect of communication, makes a lot sense as a dimension that is important in professional collaborationParadox of US communication culture: low-context communication, but indirect negative feedbackPay attention to upgraders and downgraders when giving and receiving feedbackDoes persuasion dimension has more to it than principles-first vs applications-first?Leadership dimension builds on research on power distance by Geert HofstedeLooks like, both Slava and Dima use both decisioning styles: consensual and top-downDecisions with capital D and with lower DContinued interaction over time can allow task-based trust grow into relationship-based trust and vice versaHow to build relationship trust?Does confrontational disagreement come from inexperience in other methods of debating and arguing?Flexibility with scheduling seems to be heavily dependent on contextIs our constant connectivity of modern world makes people feel like they can be more flexible with time?