Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share 1704 AD - Ancestor Altars and Gospel Boundaries - The Papal Decision That Changed China's Christian Future
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
1704 AD - Ancestor Altars and Gospel Boundaries - The Papal Decision That Changed China's Christian Future
1704 AD - Ancestor Altars and Gospel Boundaries - The Papal Decision That Changed China's Christian Future
CHUNK 0: Pre-Script SEO Framework
Full Title: 1704 AD - Ancestor Altars and Gospel Boundaries - The Papal Decision That Changed China's Christian Future
Website: https://ThatsJesus.org
Metadata Package:
In 1704, Pope Clement XI condemned Chinese Christians for honoring their ancestors—and with that sentence, a century of hope began to crumble.
For decades, Jesuit missionaries had accommodated Confucian rites, seeing them as cultural respect, not worship. But Rome saw idolatry. The papal decree sparked a crisis. Emperor Kangxi restricted missionaries. Conversions slowed. A century of progress unraveled.
The controversy still asks the church a piercing question we can't escape: where does cultural adaptation end and compromise begin? This episode explores the theological debate, the imperial backlash, and what happens when conviction and compassion collide. It's about gospel boundaries in a globalized world—and the cost of getting them wrong. Make sure you Like, Share, Subscribe, Follow, Comment, and Review this episode and the entire COACH series.
Keywords: Chinese Rites Controversy, ancestor veneration, Pope Clement XI, Ex illa die, Jesuit missions China, Emperor Kangxi, Matteo Ricci, cultural accommodation, gospel and culture, Catholic missions, 1704, Confucianism Christianity, missionary controversy, papal authority, cross-cultural ministry
Hashtags: #ChineseRites #AncestorVeneration #JesuitMissions #PopeClementXI #EmperorKangxi #GospelAndCulture #1704AD #CatholicHistory #ChurchHistory #MissionaryHistory #CulturalAccommodation #COACHPodcast #ThatsJesus #CrossCulturalMinistry #ConfucianismChristianity
Episode Summary (~250 words):
In 1704, Pope Clement XI issued a decree condemning the Jesuit practice of allowing Chinese Christians to participate in ancestor veneration rites. For decades, Jesuit missionaries had argued that honoring ancestors was a civil custom, not religious worship—a cultural practice that could coexist with Christian faith. Rome disagreed. The pope declared the rites incompatible with Christianity and ordered all missionaries to prohibit them. In 1715, he reinforced the ban with the papal bull Ex illa die, making the condemnation official and public.
The decision detonated a crisis. Emperor Kangxi, who had protected Christian missions, saw the papal decree as an insult to Chinese culture. He demanded missionaries obtain permits affirming ancestor rites were civil. Those who refused were expelled. Conversions plummeted. A mission field that had taken a century to cultivate collapsed within years.
The controversy revealed a fundamental tension: how does the gospel engage culture without losing its identity? The Jesuits believed adaptation was essential for reaching China. Their opponents—Dominicans and Franciscans—believed it was compromise. Both claimed to defend orthodoxy. Both changed the trajectory of Chinese Christianity.
This episode explores what ancestor veneration meant to the Chinese, why Rome said no, and how that decision reshaped mission history. It asks what today's global church can learn from 1704: when cultural practices and Christian conviction collide, how do we discern faithfully? The answer matters—because getting it wrong doesn't just close doors; it can lock them for generations.
CHUNK 1: Cold Hook (120-300 words)
Beijing, 1704. Inside a modest home, candlelight flickers across a wooden altar. Ancestral tablets line the shelf—names carved in characters representing generations of family honor. A Chinese Christian kneels. His hands rest on his thighs. Incense smoke curls upward, thin and gray.
Outside, winter wind scrapes against the courtyard walls. Inside, silence—except for the faint crackle of burning incense.
His grandfather's name is on one of those tablets. His father's on another. Every name represents a life, a legacy, a thread connecting past to present. To abandon this altar means severing those threads. To refuse the ritual means declaring his ancestors worthless, his family meaningless. In China, this isn't mere tradition—it's the foundation of civilization itself. It's xiao [shyow], the moral order holding society together.
But a letter exists. Somewhere, ink has dried on parchment. Somewhere, a seal has been pressed into wax. Somewhere, a decision has been made about this altar, this incense, this man's family.
He doesn't know yet.
The question that letter tries to answer is this: can a Christian honor ancestors without betraying Jesus? Can faith adapt to culture without compromise? Where is the line between respect and idolatry?
Someone believes they know the answer. Someone has decided for him. And that decision—made thousands of miles away by men who've never smelled this incense or read these characters—is already crossing an ocean.
What happens when theology written in Latin meets devotion lived in Mandarin?
[AD BREAK]
CHUNK 2: Intro (70-90 words FIXED)
From the That's Jesus Channel, welcome to COACH—where Church origins and church history actually coach us how to walk boldly with Jesus today. I'm Bob Baulch. On Friday, we stay between 1500 and 2000 AD. In this episode we are in the year 1704, and a papal decree is about to ignite a crisis that will close China to Christian missions for over a century.
CHUNK 3: Foundation (15-35% of total words)
The story begins in 1583, when Italian Jesuit Matteo Ricci [REE-chee] arrived in China with a strategy no European missionary had attempted before. He didn't come to conquer. He came to learn.
Ricci studied Mandarin until he could debate Confucian texts with Chinese scholars. He wore the robes of a literati. He taught astronomy, mathematics, cartography—contributing to Chinese science while earning respect. He didn't demand immediate conversion. He built relationships first. By the time Ricci died in 1610, Christian communities had taken root in Beijing, Nanjing, and Shanghai. The Jesuits had become imperial advisors, tutors to nobles, respected contributors to Chinese culture. Christianity wasn't foreign anymore—it was becoming Chinese.
But the strategy required accommodation. And the flashpoint was ancestor veneration.
In Chinese culture, honoring the dead wasn't optional. Families maintained ancestral tablets—wooden plaques inscribed with names of deceased relatives. They offered food at household altars, burned incense, bowed in ritual gestures. This was xiao [shyow — filial piety, the Confucian virtue of honoring parents and ancestors], the moral foundation holding society together. Refusing to participate meant rejecting your family, your heritage, your place in civilization itself.
For most Chinese, abandoning ancestor rites wasn't a theological choice—it was social suicide.
The Jesuits argued these weren't acts of worship. The tablets held no divine power. The incense wasn't an offering to spirits. The bows didn't petition the dead for favors. Chinese Christians weren't praying to ancestors—they were honoring family memory through culturally meaningful gestures, no different from Europeans placing flowers on graves.
Ricci had insisted: QUOTE The gospel must be planted in the soil of culture END QUOTE. If believers couldn't participate in the rites, they'd become outcasts. And outcasts don't evangelize—they hide.
For the Jesuits, accommodation wasn't compromise. It was wisdom.
But by 1700, rival missionary orders disagreed. Dominicans and Franciscans arriving in China looked at the same altars, the same incense, the same bowing—and saw idolatry. Intent didn't matter, they argued. The altar was an idol. The ritual dishonored God. No amount of theological nuance could baptize paganism.
The Dominicans sent reports to Rome, accusing the Jesuits of syncretism [SIN-kruh-tiz-um — blending Christian faith with non-Christian practices]. They demanded the Vatican intervene.
Meanwhile, Emperor Kangxi [kahng-SHEE], ruling since 1661, had become Christianity's greatest protector. He studied with Jesuit missionaries, debated theology with them, issued edicts protecting Christian communities. Under Kangxi, Christianity enjoyed unprecedented favor.
But the question had reached Rome: were the Jesuits missionaries or compromisers? The pope would have to decide—and his answer would determine whether the door to China stayed open or slammed shut.
CHUNK 4: Development (15-35% of total words)
By the 1690s, the controversy had moved from Chinese villages to the Vatican, where Pope Innocent XII faced a question with global stakes. If Chinese Christians could bow before ancestral tablets, what would that permit elsewhere? Could Indian converts wear caste marks? Could African believers participate in tribal ceremonies? Could European former pagans keep folk traditions?
The ruling on China would ripple through every mission field in the world.
In 1693, Rome issued a cautious decree: some Chinese rites might be acceptable if stripped of superstition. The answer was vague enough to satisfy no one. Jesuits kept accommodating. Dominicans kept protesting. The standoff continued until 1700, when Clement XI became pope.
Unlike his predecessor, Clement was decisive—and deeply suspicious of Jesuit flexibility. He studied the Dominican testimonies and concluded the Jesuits had compromised too far. The Dominicans had written: QUOTE The rites are not merely civil customs but contain elements fundamentally incompatible with Christian worship END QUOTE. Their argument was clear: appearance mattered as much as intent. Even if Chinese Christians claimed no religious belief in the power of ancestors, the rituals themselves honored spirits and perpetuated practices rooted in false theology.
Rome listened.
On November 20, 1704, Pope Clement XI issued his decree. Chinese Christians could not venerate ancestors. Could not maintain ancestral tablets. Could not participate in Confucian ceremonies honoring Confucius or the dead. The practices were idolatrous, incompatible with Christian worship. The decree went further: missionaries could use only Tian-zhu [tyen-JOO — "Lord of Heaven"] for God, forbidding alternative translations. Every missionary in China would swear an oath of obedience.
The decree stunned the Jesuits. Years of patient strategy—learning language, earning trust, building relationships—unraveled in a papal sentence.
But Rome had spoken. The Jesuits, bound by their vow of obedience, could not refuse.
In 1705, papal legate Charles-Thomas Maillard de Tournon [shall-tahm MY-ar duh toor-NOHN] arrived in Beijing carrying the decree, expecting diplomatic courtesy.
He got fury.
Emperor Kangxi didn't see theological clarity—he saw cultural arrogance. For forty years, he had protected missionaries, studied with them, defended them. Now Rome was declaring that xiao—the moral foundation of Chinese society—was pagan idolatry.
The emperor's response was swift. If missionaries wanted to remain in China, they would obtain an imperial permit—a piao [pyow]. To receive it, they had to affirm in writing that ancestor rites were civil customs and promise never to interfere.
The Jesuits, caught between papal decree and imperial demand, mostly complied. They took the permits. They stayed.
The Dominicans and Franciscans—the ones who demanded Rome intervene—refused. They would not contradict the pope.
Kangxi began restricting missionaries who refused permits. Churches faced scrutiny. Christian gatherings drew suspicion. Conversions, once numbering thousands annually, slowed to a trickle as potential believers weighed the cost of joining a faith that rejected their families.
The mission wasn't stalling. It was fracturing.
CHUNK 5: Climax/Impact (15-35% of total words)
Over the next decade, the situation deteriorated from crisis to collapse.
By 1710, papal legate Tournon was under house arrest in Macau, isolated and ill. He died there the same year, his mission failed, his health broken. Kangxi, once Christianity's greatest protector in Asia, had become its obstacle. Missionaries without permits faced expulsion. Those who stayed lived under suspicion.
In 1715, Pope Clement XI escalated. He issued the papal bull Ex illa die [eks ILL-ah DEE-ay — Latin for "From that day"], making the 1704 condemnation official Church teaching. No ambiguity remained. Ancestor veneration was forbidden. Jesuits who had accommodated were disciplined.
The Jesuits made one final appeal. QUOTE The same gesture can carry different meanings in different lands END QUOTE, they insisted. Context mattered. Intent mattered. A bow in China wasn't the same as worship in Europe.
Rome rejected the appeal.
In 1742, Pope Benedict XIV issued the final word: Ex quo singulari [eks kwoh sin-goo-LAH-ree — Latin for "From the singular moment"], confirming and extending the ban. The controversy was over. The Church had spoken definitively.
But so was the mission.
Christian communities across China faced an impossible choice: abandon faith or abandon family. Most chose family. Churches emptied. In 1724—just twenty years after the initial decree—Christianity was officially banned throughout China. Missionaries went underground or fled. The few who remained worked in secret, cut off from the communities they'd spent decades building.
The door Matteo Ricci had opened in 1583 with patience and friendship slammed shut in 1724. It stayed closed for over a century.
The Jesuits accommodated to save the mission. Rome condemned to save the gospel. Both believed they defended Jesus. Both lost China.
The question revealed a tension the church still navigates: how far can faith adapt to culture without losing its soul? That decision didn't just close China—it shaped how Christianity approached non-European cultures for centuries. Missionaries who came after wrestled with the same question: which cultural practices can Christians keep, and which must they abandon?
In 1939—two hundred thirty-five years later—Pope Pius XII quietly reversed Rome's position. Chinese Catholics could participate in civil ceremonies honoring ancestors and Confucius. The Vatican acknowledged what the Jesuits had argued: cultural context matters, intent matters, the same ritual can honor heritage without dishonoring God.
But the reversal came generations too late. By 1939, Christianity in China was marginal, suspect, associated with foreign colonialism.
The lesson was learned at catastrophic cost. When cultural practice and Christian conviction collide, how do we discern faithfully—before the price becomes unbearable?
[AD BREAK]
CHUNK 6: Legacy & Modern Relevance (5-20% of total words)
The wound left a scar.
Today's global church still wrestles with the same tension. From Africa to Asia to Latin America, believers navigate cultural accommodation daily: when does honoring tradition become compromising truth? When does defending doctrine become cultural imperialism? The Chinese Rites Controversy stands as both warning and lesson for every missionary, every church planter, every denominational leader facing that question now.
Modern missionaries study the controversy as a case study in cross-cultural ministry ethics. Mission agencies train workers to discern the difference between cultural practice and spiritual compromise. Theologians debate whether Rome was right—some argue the ban preserved doctrinal purity at necessary cost; others believe the Jesuits understood Chinese culture better than Roman theologians ever could.
What's undeniable: the stakes are human, not just theological. Whole communities can be lost when the church confuses its cultural preferences with God's unchanging truth. Entire generations can be alienated when it compromises that truth for acceptance. The controversy reminds the global church that cultural sensitivity matters—but so does worship that belongs to God alone. Rigid gatekeeping loses cultures. Reckless accommodation loses the gospel. Both extremes lead to disaster.
The question hasn't changed in three hundred years: where does cultural respect end and spiritual compromise begin? Neither has the cost of getting the answer wrong. The Chinese Rites Controversy teaches modern Christianity that wisdom requires humility, discernment, and courage to walk the narrow way between extremes—because the door that slams shut may stay closed for generations.
CHUNK 7: Reflection & Call (5-20% of total words)
That struggle belongs to us now.
Every believer faces the same crossroads: how do we live faithfully in a culture that doesn't share our convictions? Do we adapt to reach people, or stand firm even when it costs influence? The answer isn't simple—and pretending it is means we haven't wrestled honestly with the question.
Both extremes lead to disaster. Cultural sensitivity matters. Worship that belongs to God alone matters. Seeing only one side leads to loss.
So what does faithfulness look like?
It starts with humility—admitting we don't always know where the line is. It continues with discernment—studying Scripture, seeking the Spirit, asking hard questions. It requires courage—honoring culture without worshiping it, standing for truth even when it costs friendships or influence.
Before you adopt a tradition, a trend, a value from your culture, ask: does this point people toward Jesus or away from Him? Does it honor God while respecting culture, or dilute truth for acceptance?
And when you stand firm on conviction, ask: am I defending truth or defending my comfort? Protecting the gospel or protecting my preferences?
The narrow way isn't rigid fundamentalism. It isn't cultural surrender either. It's walking with Jesus in the tension—loving people enough to enter their world, loving Him enough never to compromise His lordship.
So ask yourself today: where am I bending to fit in when I should stand for Christ? Where am I standing rigid when I should bend with grace?
Walk the narrow way. Let conviction guide you. Let compassion steady you. Trust that the Lord who numbers every culture also redeems them—when His people follow Him faithfully into the hard places where answers aren't easy and the cost isn't small.
CHUNK 8: Outro (120-200 words FIXED)
If this story of ancestor altars and gospel boundaries stirred or strengthened you, share it with someone who might need to hear it today. Make sure you go to https://ThatsJesus.org for other COACH episodes and resources. Don't forget to follow, like, comment, review, subscribe and TUNE IN for more COACH episodes every week. Every episode dives into a different corner of church history. But on Friday, we stay between 1500 and 2000 AD. Thanks for listening to COACH—where Church origins and church history actually coach us how to walk boldly with Jesus today. I'm Bob Baulch with the That's Jesus Channel. Have a great day—and be blessed.
[Humor]: You know, after researching this episode, I tried to sum up this Chinese Rites Controversy in one sentence. Basically, nobody listened and everyone lost. And that about sums it up.
[Humanity]: Wendy reminded me this morning that every time we face a hard decision about faith and culture, we're standing where those missionaries stood. The difference is, we get to learn from their mistakes. That's a gift we shouldn't waste.
CHUNK 9: References (Not Spoken)
9a: Quotes
Q1 - Paraphrased (Historical Principle) Description: Matteo Ricci's missionary philosophy of cultural accommodation Type: Paraphrased from Jesuit missiology Text: "The gospel must be planted in the soil of culture"
Q2 - Paraphrased (Dominican Argument) Description: Dominican opposition to Jesuit accommodation during Rites Controversy Type: Paraphrased from historical appeals to Rome Text: "The rites are not merely civil customs but contain elements fundamentally incompatible with Christian worship"
Q3 - Paraphrased (Jesuit Defense) Description: Jesuit defense of accommodation during Rites Controversy Type: Paraphrased from historical appeals to Rome Text: "The same gesture can carry different meanings in different lands"
9b: Z-Notes (Zero Dispute Notes)
Z1 - Matteo Ricci arrived in China in 1583 and died in 1610; he pioneered the Jesuit accommodation strategy.
Z2 - By 1700, Jesuit missionaries had established Christian communities in Beijing, Nanjing, and Shanghai.
Z3 - Jesuit missionaries aimed to accommodate Chinese customs, including Confucian ancestor veneration.
Z4 - Jesuits distinguished between veneration of ancestors and idolatry, seeing ancestor rites as civil/social rituals.
Z5 - The Rites Controversy centered on whether Christians could continue traditional Chinese rites honoring ancestors and Confucius.
Z6 - Dominicans and Franciscans opposed the Jesuit position, calling the rites incompatible with Christianity.
Z7 - Pope Clement XI issued a decree condemning the tolerance of Chinese rites on November 20, 1704.
Z8 - The papal bull Ex illa die was issued on March 19, 1715, by Pope Clement XI, making the condemnation official and public.
Z9 - Papal legate Charles-Thomas Maillard de Tournon arrived in Beijing in 1705 to enforce the Vatican's decree.
Z10 - Tournon was detained in Macau and died there in 1710, reflecting the intensity of imperial backlash.
Z11 - Emperor Kangxi (ruled 1661-1722) objected to the papal ruling and defended the civil nature of ancestor rites.
Z12 - Kangxi required missionaries to obtain an imperial permit (piao) affirming ancestor rites were civil and promising not to interfere.
Z13 - Missionaries who refused the emperor's permit faced restrictions and eventual expulsion.
Z14 - Pope Benedict XIV issued the papal bull Ex quo singulari in 1742, confirming and extending the ban on Chinese rites.
Z15 - The controversy resulted in a sharp decline in missionary influence and conversions in China.
Z16 - Christianity was officially banned in China in 1724 under Kangxi's successors.
Z17 - Jesuit missionaries contributed significantly to Chinese science, astronomy, mathematics, and cartography.
Z18 - In 1939, Pope Pius XII reversed the ban, declaring Chinese Catholics could participate in civil ceremonies honoring ancestors.
Z19 - Xiao (filial piety) is the Confucian virtue of honoring parents and ancestors, foundational to Chinese culture.
Z20 - The 1704 decree mandated missionaries use only Tian-zhu (Lord of Heaven) for God, forbidding alternative translations.
9c: POP (Parallel Orthodox Perspectives)
P1 - Catholic theologians defending Rome's decision argued that doctrinal purity must take precedence over missionary success.
P2 - Jesuit defenders maintained that cultural accommodation was essential to effective evangelism and pastoral care.
P3 - Dominican and Franciscan critics believed Jesuit accommodation crossed the line into syncretism and compromised Christian worship.
P4 - Some Catholic scholars argue the 1704 decision protected the uniqueness of Christian worship against cultural dilution.
P5 - Other Catholic historians believe the Jesuits better understood Chinese culture and that Rome's rigidity was pastorally unwise.
P6 - Protestant missionaries in China later faced similar dilemmas about cultural accommodation vs. doctrinal boundaries.
P7 - Modern Catholic missiology emphasizes inculturation—adapting the gospel to culture while preserving essential doctrine.
P8 - The 1939 Vatican reversal acknowledged that cultural context and intent matter in evaluating traditional practices.
P9 - Some theologians argue both sides in the controversy were defending legitimate concerns—purity and accessibility—but lacked nuance.
P10 - Ecumenical mission scholars today study the Chinese Rites Controversy as a case study in cross-cultural ministry ethics.
9d: SCOP (Skeptical or Contrary Opinion Points)
S1 - Secular historians argue the controversy was more about European power struggles between religious orders than theology.
S2 - Some critics claim the Jesuits prioritized conversions over doctrinal integrity, essentially practicing "cheap grace."
S3 - Rationalist scholars suggest both sides failed to recognize that all religious practices are culturally constructed.
S4 - Postcolonial critics see the entire debate as European imperialism imposing itself on Chinese culture.
S5 - Some skeptics argue Rome's reversal in 1939 proves the church makes arbitrary decisions based on politics, not principle.
S6 - Anti-Catholic polemicists use the controversy as evidence of papal fallibility and institutional arrogance.
S7 - Confucian scholars argue that Christian missionaries never truly understood xiao and misrepresented ancestor veneration.
S8 - Marxist historians interpret the controversy as class struggle between elite Jesuits and populist mendicant orders.
S9 - Some secular ethicists claim the church had no right to tell Chinese Christians how to honor their families.
S10 - Religious pluralists argue the entire controversy shows the futility of exclusive truth claims in religion.
9e: Sources
Brockey, L. M. (2007). Journey to the East: The Jesuit Mission to China, 1579–1724. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 9780674023506. (Z1, Z2, Z3, Z4, Z5, Z7, Z8, Z9, Z10, Z11, Z12, Z13, Z14, Z15, Z17, Q1, Q2, P2, P5)
Mungello, D. E. (1999). The Curious Land: Jesuit Accommodation and the Origins of Sinology. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN: 9780824821323. (Z1, Z3, Z4, Z5, Z14, Z17, Q1, Q3, P2, P5, P10)
Rule, P. (1986). K'ung-tzu or Confucius?: The Jesuit Interpretation of Confucianism. Allen & Unwin. ISBN: 9780868619564. (Z4, Z5, Z11, Z19, P2, S7)
Hsia, R. P. (2009). A Jesuit in the Forbidden City: Matteo Ricci, 1552–1610. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199594606. (Z1, Z17, Q1, P2)
Mungello, D. E. (2012). The Catholic Invasion of China: Remaking Chinese Christianity. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN: 9781442209004. (Z2, Z5, Z15, Z16, P1, P4, Q2, S2)
Standaert, N. (Ed.). (2001). Handbook of Christianity in China. Brill. ISBN: 9789004114429. (Z2, Z6, Z15, Z16, Z18, P7, P10)
Gernet, J. (1985). China and the Christian Impact: A Conflict of Cultures. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521316873. (Z5, Z6, Z15, S4, S7)
Spence, J. D. (1998). The Memory Palace of Matteo Ricci. Penguin Books. ISBN: 9780141615769. (Z1, Z17, Q1)
The Holy Bible, New International Version. (2011). Biblica, Inc. ISBN: 9781563207075. (General scriptural principles on cultural engagement and gospel boundaries)
CHUNK 10: Credits
Host & Producer: Bob Baulch Production Company: That's Jesus Channel
PRODUCTION NOTES: All content decisions, theological positions, historical interpretations, and editorial choices are the sole responsibility of Bob Baulch and That's Jesus Channel. AI tools assist with research and drafting only.
Episode Development Assistance:
Script Development Assistance:
All AI-generated content was reviewed, edited, verified, and approved by Bob Baulch. Final authority for all historical claims, theological statements, and content accuracy rests with human editorial oversight.
Sound and Visualization: Adobe Podcast Video Production (if applicable): Adobe Premiere Pro
Digital License: Audio 1 – Background Music: "Background Music Soft Calm" by INPLUSMUSIC, Pixabay Content License, Composer: Poradovskyi Andrii (BMI IPI Number: 01055591064), Source: Pixabay, YouTube: INPLUSMUSIC Channel, Instagram: @inplusmusic
Digital License: Audio 2 – Crescendo: "Epic Trailer Short 0022 Sec" by BurtySounds, Pixabay Content License, Source: Pixabay
Production Note: Audio and video elements integrated in post-production. AI tools provide research and drafting assistance; human expertise provides final verification, theological authority, and editorial decisions. Bob Baulch assumes full responsibility for all content.
View all episodes
By That’s Jesus Channel / Bob Baulch1704 AD - Ancestor Altars and Gospel Boundaries - The Papal Decision That Changed China's Christian Future
CHUNK 0: Pre-Script SEO Framework
Full Title: 1704 AD - Ancestor Altars and Gospel Boundaries - The Papal Decision That Changed China's Christian Future
Website: https://ThatsJesus.org
Metadata Package:
In 1704, Pope Clement XI condemned Chinese Christians for honoring their ancestors—and with that sentence, a century of hope began to crumble.
For decades, Jesuit missionaries had accommodated Confucian rites, seeing them as cultural respect, not worship. But Rome saw idolatry. The papal decree sparked a crisis. Emperor Kangxi restricted missionaries. Conversions slowed. A century of progress unraveled.
The controversy still asks the church a piercing question we can't escape: where does cultural adaptation end and compromise begin? This episode explores the theological debate, the imperial backlash, and what happens when conviction and compassion collide. It's about gospel boundaries in a globalized world—and the cost of getting them wrong. Make sure you Like, Share, Subscribe, Follow, Comment, and Review this episode and the entire COACH series.
Keywords: Chinese Rites Controversy, ancestor veneration, Pope Clement XI, Ex illa die, Jesuit missions China, Emperor Kangxi, Matteo Ricci, cultural accommodation, gospel and culture, Catholic missions, 1704, Confucianism Christianity, missionary controversy, papal authority, cross-cultural ministry
Hashtags: #ChineseRites #AncestorVeneration #JesuitMissions #PopeClementXI #EmperorKangxi #GospelAndCulture #1704AD #CatholicHistory #ChurchHistory #MissionaryHistory #CulturalAccommodation #COACHPodcast #ThatsJesus #CrossCulturalMinistry #ConfucianismChristianity
Episode Summary (~250 words):
In 1704, Pope Clement XI issued a decree condemning the Jesuit practice of allowing Chinese Christians to participate in ancestor veneration rites. For decades, Jesuit missionaries had argued that honoring ancestors was a civil custom, not religious worship—a cultural practice that could coexist with Christian faith. Rome disagreed. The pope declared the rites incompatible with Christianity and ordered all missionaries to prohibit them. In 1715, he reinforced the ban with the papal bull Ex illa die, making the condemnation official and public.
The decision detonated a crisis. Emperor Kangxi, who had protected Christian missions, saw the papal decree as an insult to Chinese culture. He demanded missionaries obtain permits affirming ancestor rites were civil. Those who refused were expelled. Conversions plummeted. A mission field that had taken a century to cultivate collapsed within years.
The controversy revealed a fundamental tension: how does the gospel engage culture without losing its identity? The Jesuits believed adaptation was essential for reaching China. Their opponents—Dominicans and Franciscans—believed it was compromise. Both claimed to defend orthodoxy. Both changed the trajectory of Chinese Christianity.
This episode explores what ancestor veneration meant to the Chinese, why Rome said no, and how that decision reshaped mission history. It asks what today's global church can learn from 1704: when cultural practices and Christian conviction collide, how do we discern faithfully? The answer matters—because getting it wrong doesn't just close doors; it can lock them for generations.
CHUNK 1: Cold Hook (120-300 words)
Beijing, 1704. Inside a modest home, candlelight flickers across a wooden altar. Ancestral tablets line the shelf—names carved in characters representing generations of family honor. A Chinese Christian kneels. His hands rest on his thighs. Incense smoke curls upward, thin and gray.
Outside, winter wind scrapes against the courtyard walls. Inside, silence—except for the faint crackle of burning incense.
His grandfather's name is on one of those tablets. His father's on another. Every name represents a life, a legacy, a thread connecting past to present. To abandon this altar means severing those threads. To refuse the ritual means declaring his ancestors worthless, his family meaningless. In China, this isn't mere tradition—it's the foundation of civilization itself. It's xiao [shyow], the moral order holding society together.
But a letter exists. Somewhere, ink has dried on parchment. Somewhere, a seal has been pressed into wax. Somewhere, a decision has been made about this altar, this incense, this man's family.
He doesn't know yet.
The question that letter tries to answer is this: can a Christian honor ancestors without betraying Jesus? Can faith adapt to culture without compromise? Where is the line between respect and idolatry?
Someone believes they know the answer. Someone has decided for him. And that decision—made thousands of miles away by men who've never smelled this incense or read these characters—is already crossing an ocean.
What happens when theology written in Latin meets devotion lived in Mandarin?
[AD BREAK]
CHUNK 2: Intro (70-90 words FIXED)
From the That's Jesus Channel, welcome to COACH—where Church origins and church history actually coach us how to walk boldly with Jesus today. I'm Bob Baulch. On Friday, we stay between 1500 and 2000 AD. In this episode we are in the year 1704, and a papal decree is about to ignite a crisis that will close China to Christian missions for over a century.
CHUNK 3: Foundation (15-35% of total words)
The story begins in 1583, when Italian Jesuit Matteo Ricci [REE-chee] arrived in China with a strategy no European missionary had attempted before. He didn't come to conquer. He came to learn.
Ricci studied Mandarin until he could debate Confucian texts with Chinese scholars. He wore the robes of a literati. He taught astronomy, mathematics, cartography—contributing to Chinese science while earning respect. He didn't demand immediate conversion. He built relationships first. By the time Ricci died in 1610, Christian communities had taken root in Beijing, Nanjing, and Shanghai. The Jesuits had become imperial advisors, tutors to nobles, respected contributors to Chinese culture. Christianity wasn't foreign anymore—it was becoming Chinese.
But the strategy required accommodation. And the flashpoint was ancestor veneration.
In Chinese culture, honoring the dead wasn't optional. Families maintained ancestral tablets—wooden plaques inscribed with names of deceased relatives. They offered food at household altars, burned incense, bowed in ritual gestures. This was xiao [shyow — filial piety, the Confucian virtue of honoring parents and ancestors], the moral foundation holding society together. Refusing to participate meant rejecting your family, your heritage, your place in civilization itself.
For most Chinese, abandoning ancestor rites wasn't a theological choice—it was social suicide.
The Jesuits argued these weren't acts of worship. The tablets held no divine power. The incense wasn't an offering to spirits. The bows didn't petition the dead for favors. Chinese Christians weren't praying to ancestors—they were honoring family memory through culturally meaningful gestures, no different from Europeans placing flowers on graves.
Ricci had insisted: QUOTE The gospel must be planted in the soil of culture END QUOTE. If believers couldn't participate in the rites, they'd become outcasts. And outcasts don't evangelize—they hide.
For the Jesuits, accommodation wasn't compromise. It was wisdom.
But by 1700, rival missionary orders disagreed. Dominicans and Franciscans arriving in China looked at the same altars, the same incense, the same bowing—and saw idolatry. Intent didn't matter, they argued. The altar was an idol. The ritual dishonored God. No amount of theological nuance could baptize paganism.
The Dominicans sent reports to Rome, accusing the Jesuits of syncretism [SIN-kruh-tiz-um — blending Christian faith with non-Christian practices]. They demanded the Vatican intervene.
Meanwhile, Emperor Kangxi [kahng-SHEE], ruling since 1661, had become Christianity's greatest protector. He studied with Jesuit missionaries, debated theology with them, issued edicts protecting Christian communities. Under Kangxi, Christianity enjoyed unprecedented favor.
But the question had reached Rome: were the Jesuits missionaries or compromisers? The pope would have to decide—and his answer would determine whether the door to China stayed open or slammed shut.
CHUNK 4: Development (15-35% of total words)
By the 1690s, the controversy had moved from Chinese villages to the Vatican, where Pope Innocent XII faced a question with global stakes. If Chinese Christians could bow before ancestral tablets, what would that permit elsewhere? Could Indian converts wear caste marks? Could African believers participate in tribal ceremonies? Could European former pagans keep folk traditions?
The ruling on China would ripple through every mission field in the world.
In 1693, Rome issued a cautious decree: some Chinese rites might be acceptable if stripped of superstition. The answer was vague enough to satisfy no one. Jesuits kept accommodating. Dominicans kept protesting. The standoff continued until 1700, when Clement XI became pope.
Unlike his predecessor, Clement was decisive—and deeply suspicious of Jesuit flexibility. He studied the Dominican testimonies and concluded the Jesuits had compromised too far. The Dominicans had written: QUOTE The rites are not merely civil customs but contain elements fundamentally incompatible with Christian worship END QUOTE. Their argument was clear: appearance mattered as much as intent. Even if Chinese Christians claimed no religious belief in the power of ancestors, the rituals themselves honored spirits and perpetuated practices rooted in false theology.
Rome listened.
On November 20, 1704, Pope Clement XI issued his decree. Chinese Christians could not venerate ancestors. Could not maintain ancestral tablets. Could not participate in Confucian ceremonies honoring Confucius or the dead. The practices were idolatrous, incompatible with Christian worship. The decree went further: missionaries could use only Tian-zhu [tyen-JOO — "Lord of Heaven"] for God, forbidding alternative translations. Every missionary in China would swear an oath of obedience.
The decree stunned the Jesuits. Years of patient strategy—learning language, earning trust, building relationships—unraveled in a papal sentence.
But Rome had spoken. The Jesuits, bound by their vow of obedience, could not refuse.
In 1705, papal legate Charles-Thomas Maillard de Tournon [shall-tahm MY-ar duh toor-NOHN] arrived in Beijing carrying the decree, expecting diplomatic courtesy.
He got fury.
Emperor Kangxi didn't see theological clarity—he saw cultural arrogance. For forty years, he had protected missionaries, studied with them, defended them. Now Rome was declaring that xiao—the moral foundation of Chinese society—was pagan idolatry.
The emperor's response was swift. If missionaries wanted to remain in China, they would obtain an imperial permit—a piao [pyow]. To receive it, they had to affirm in writing that ancestor rites were civil customs and promise never to interfere.
The Jesuits, caught between papal decree and imperial demand, mostly complied. They took the permits. They stayed.
The Dominicans and Franciscans—the ones who demanded Rome intervene—refused. They would not contradict the pope.
Kangxi began restricting missionaries who refused permits. Churches faced scrutiny. Christian gatherings drew suspicion. Conversions, once numbering thousands annually, slowed to a trickle as potential believers weighed the cost of joining a faith that rejected their families.
The mission wasn't stalling. It was fracturing.
CHUNK 5: Climax/Impact (15-35% of total words)
Over the next decade, the situation deteriorated from crisis to collapse.
By 1710, papal legate Tournon was under house arrest in Macau, isolated and ill. He died there the same year, his mission failed, his health broken. Kangxi, once Christianity's greatest protector in Asia, had become its obstacle. Missionaries without permits faced expulsion. Those who stayed lived under suspicion.
In 1715, Pope Clement XI escalated. He issued the papal bull Ex illa die [eks ILL-ah DEE-ay — Latin for "From that day"], making the 1704 condemnation official Church teaching. No ambiguity remained. Ancestor veneration was forbidden. Jesuits who had accommodated were disciplined.
The Jesuits made one final appeal. QUOTE The same gesture can carry different meanings in different lands END QUOTE, they insisted. Context mattered. Intent mattered. A bow in China wasn't the same as worship in Europe.
Rome rejected the appeal.
In 1742, Pope Benedict XIV issued the final word: Ex quo singulari [eks kwoh sin-goo-LAH-ree — Latin for "From the singular moment"], confirming and extending the ban. The controversy was over. The Church had spoken definitively.
But so was the mission.
Christian communities across China faced an impossible choice: abandon faith or abandon family. Most chose family. Churches emptied. In 1724—just twenty years after the initial decree—Christianity was officially banned throughout China. Missionaries went underground or fled. The few who remained worked in secret, cut off from the communities they'd spent decades building.
The door Matteo Ricci had opened in 1583 with patience and friendship slammed shut in 1724. It stayed closed for over a century.
The Jesuits accommodated to save the mission. Rome condemned to save the gospel. Both believed they defended Jesus. Both lost China.
The question revealed a tension the church still navigates: how far can faith adapt to culture without losing its soul? That decision didn't just close China—it shaped how Christianity approached non-European cultures for centuries. Missionaries who came after wrestled with the same question: which cultural practices can Christians keep, and which must they abandon?
In 1939—two hundred thirty-five years later—Pope Pius XII quietly reversed Rome's position. Chinese Catholics could participate in civil ceremonies honoring ancestors and Confucius. The Vatican acknowledged what the Jesuits had argued: cultural context matters, intent matters, the same ritual can honor heritage without dishonoring God.
But the reversal came generations too late. By 1939, Christianity in China was marginal, suspect, associated with foreign colonialism.
The lesson was learned at catastrophic cost. When cultural practice and Christian conviction collide, how do we discern faithfully—before the price becomes unbearable?
[AD BREAK]
CHUNK 6: Legacy & Modern Relevance (5-20% of total words)
The wound left a scar.
Today's global church still wrestles with the same tension. From Africa to Asia to Latin America, believers navigate cultural accommodation daily: when does honoring tradition become compromising truth? When does defending doctrine become cultural imperialism? The Chinese Rites Controversy stands as both warning and lesson for every missionary, every church planter, every denominational leader facing that question now.
Modern missionaries study the controversy as a case study in cross-cultural ministry ethics. Mission agencies train workers to discern the difference between cultural practice and spiritual compromise. Theologians debate whether Rome was right—some argue the ban preserved doctrinal purity at necessary cost; others believe the Jesuits understood Chinese culture better than Roman theologians ever could.
What's undeniable: the stakes are human, not just theological. Whole communities can be lost when the church confuses its cultural preferences with God's unchanging truth. Entire generations can be alienated when it compromises that truth for acceptance. The controversy reminds the global church that cultural sensitivity matters—but so does worship that belongs to God alone. Rigid gatekeeping loses cultures. Reckless accommodation loses the gospel. Both extremes lead to disaster.
The question hasn't changed in three hundred years: where does cultural respect end and spiritual compromise begin? Neither has the cost of getting the answer wrong. The Chinese Rites Controversy teaches modern Christianity that wisdom requires humility, discernment, and courage to walk the narrow way between extremes—because the door that slams shut may stay closed for generations.
CHUNK 7: Reflection & Call (5-20% of total words)
That struggle belongs to us now.
Every believer faces the same crossroads: how do we live faithfully in a culture that doesn't share our convictions? Do we adapt to reach people, or stand firm even when it costs influence? The answer isn't simple—and pretending it is means we haven't wrestled honestly with the question.
Both extremes lead to disaster. Cultural sensitivity matters. Worship that belongs to God alone matters. Seeing only one side leads to loss.
So what does faithfulness look like?
It starts with humility—admitting we don't always know where the line is. It continues with discernment—studying Scripture, seeking the Spirit, asking hard questions. It requires courage—honoring culture without worshiping it, standing for truth even when it costs friendships or influence.
Before you adopt a tradition, a trend, a value from your culture, ask: does this point people toward Jesus or away from Him? Does it honor God while respecting culture, or dilute truth for acceptance?
And when you stand firm on conviction, ask: am I defending truth or defending my comfort? Protecting the gospel or protecting my preferences?
The narrow way isn't rigid fundamentalism. It isn't cultural surrender either. It's walking with Jesus in the tension—loving people enough to enter their world, loving Him enough never to compromise His lordship.
So ask yourself today: where am I bending to fit in when I should stand for Christ? Where am I standing rigid when I should bend with grace?
Walk the narrow way. Let conviction guide you. Let compassion steady you. Trust that the Lord who numbers every culture also redeems them—when His people follow Him faithfully into the hard places where answers aren't easy and the cost isn't small.
CHUNK 8: Outro (120-200 words FIXED)
If this story of ancestor altars and gospel boundaries stirred or strengthened you, share it with someone who might need to hear it today. Make sure you go to https://ThatsJesus.org for other COACH episodes and resources. Don't forget to follow, like, comment, review, subscribe and TUNE IN for more COACH episodes every week. Every episode dives into a different corner of church history. But on Friday, we stay between 1500 and 2000 AD. Thanks for listening to COACH—where Church origins and church history actually coach us how to walk boldly with Jesus today. I'm Bob Baulch with the That's Jesus Channel. Have a great day—and be blessed.
[Humor]: You know, after researching this episode, I tried to sum up this Chinese Rites Controversy in one sentence. Basically, nobody listened and everyone lost. And that about sums it up.
[Humanity]: Wendy reminded me this morning that every time we face a hard decision about faith and culture, we're standing where those missionaries stood. The difference is, we get to learn from their mistakes. That's a gift we shouldn't waste.
CHUNK 9: References (Not Spoken)
9a: Quotes
Q1 - Paraphrased (Historical Principle) Description: Matteo Ricci's missionary philosophy of cultural accommodation Type: Paraphrased from Jesuit missiology Text: "The gospel must be planted in the soil of culture"
Q2 - Paraphrased (Dominican Argument) Description: Dominican opposition to Jesuit accommodation during Rites Controversy Type: Paraphrased from historical appeals to Rome Text: "The rites are not merely civil customs but contain elements fundamentally incompatible with Christian worship"
Q3 - Paraphrased (Jesuit Defense) Description: Jesuit defense of accommodation during Rites Controversy Type: Paraphrased from historical appeals to Rome Text: "The same gesture can carry different meanings in different lands"
9b: Z-Notes (Zero Dispute Notes)
Z1 - Matteo Ricci arrived in China in 1583 and died in 1610; he pioneered the Jesuit accommodation strategy.
Z2 - By 1700, Jesuit missionaries had established Christian communities in Beijing, Nanjing, and Shanghai.
Z3 - Jesuit missionaries aimed to accommodate Chinese customs, including Confucian ancestor veneration.
Z4 - Jesuits distinguished between veneration of ancestors and idolatry, seeing ancestor rites as civil/social rituals.
Z5 - The Rites Controversy centered on whether Christians could continue traditional Chinese rites honoring ancestors and Confucius.
Z6 - Dominicans and Franciscans opposed the Jesuit position, calling the rites incompatible with Christianity.
Z7 - Pope Clement XI issued a decree condemning the tolerance of Chinese rites on November 20, 1704.
Z8 - The papal bull Ex illa die was issued on March 19, 1715, by Pope Clement XI, making the condemnation official and public.
Z9 - Papal legate Charles-Thomas Maillard de Tournon arrived in Beijing in 1705 to enforce the Vatican's decree.
Z10 - Tournon was detained in Macau and died there in 1710, reflecting the intensity of imperial backlash.
Z11 - Emperor Kangxi (ruled 1661-1722) objected to the papal ruling and defended the civil nature of ancestor rites.
Z12 - Kangxi required missionaries to obtain an imperial permit (piao) affirming ancestor rites were civil and promising not to interfere.
Z13 - Missionaries who refused the emperor's permit faced restrictions and eventual expulsion.
Z14 - Pope Benedict XIV issued the papal bull Ex quo singulari in 1742, confirming and extending the ban on Chinese rites.
Z15 - The controversy resulted in a sharp decline in missionary influence and conversions in China.
Z16 - Christianity was officially banned in China in 1724 under Kangxi's successors.
Z17 - Jesuit missionaries contributed significantly to Chinese science, astronomy, mathematics, and cartography.
Z18 - In 1939, Pope Pius XII reversed the ban, declaring Chinese Catholics could participate in civil ceremonies honoring ancestors.
Z19 - Xiao (filial piety) is the Confucian virtue of honoring parents and ancestors, foundational to Chinese culture.
Z20 - The 1704 decree mandated missionaries use only Tian-zhu (Lord of Heaven) for God, forbidding alternative translations.
9c: POP (Parallel Orthodox Perspectives)
P1 - Catholic theologians defending Rome's decision argued that doctrinal purity must take precedence over missionary success.
P2 - Jesuit defenders maintained that cultural accommodation was essential to effective evangelism and pastoral care.
P3 - Dominican and Franciscan critics believed Jesuit accommodation crossed the line into syncretism and compromised Christian worship.
P4 - Some Catholic scholars argue the 1704 decision protected the uniqueness of Christian worship against cultural dilution.
P5 - Other Catholic historians believe the Jesuits better understood Chinese culture and that Rome's rigidity was pastorally unwise.
P6 - Protestant missionaries in China later faced similar dilemmas about cultural accommodation vs. doctrinal boundaries.
P7 - Modern Catholic missiology emphasizes inculturation—adapting the gospel to culture while preserving essential doctrine.
P8 - The 1939 Vatican reversal acknowledged that cultural context and intent matter in evaluating traditional practices.
P9 - Some theologians argue both sides in the controversy were defending legitimate concerns—purity and accessibility—but lacked nuance.
P10 - Ecumenical mission scholars today study the Chinese Rites Controversy as a case study in cross-cultural ministry ethics.
9d: SCOP (Skeptical or Contrary Opinion Points)
S1 - Secular historians argue the controversy was more about European power struggles between religious orders than theology.
S2 - Some critics claim the Jesuits prioritized conversions over doctrinal integrity, essentially practicing "cheap grace."
S3 - Rationalist scholars suggest both sides failed to recognize that all religious practices are culturally constructed.
S4 - Postcolonial critics see the entire debate as European imperialism imposing itself on Chinese culture.
S5 - Some skeptics argue Rome's reversal in 1939 proves the church makes arbitrary decisions based on politics, not principle.
S6 - Anti-Catholic polemicists use the controversy as evidence of papal fallibility and institutional arrogance.
S7 - Confucian scholars argue that Christian missionaries never truly understood xiao and misrepresented ancestor veneration.
S8 - Marxist historians interpret the controversy as class struggle between elite Jesuits and populist mendicant orders.
S9 - Some secular ethicists claim the church had no right to tell Chinese Christians how to honor their families.
S10 - Religious pluralists argue the entire controversy shows the futility of exclusive truth claims in religion.
9e: Sources
Brockey, L. M. (2007). Journey to the East: The Jesuit Mission to China, 1579–1724. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 9780674023506. (Z1, Z2, Z3, Z4, Z5, Z7, Z8, Z9, Z10, Z11, Z12, Z13, Z14, Z15, Z17, Q1, Q2, P2, P5)
Mungello, D. E. (1999). The Curious Land: Jesuit Accommodation and the Origins of Sinology. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN: 9780824821323. (Z1, Z3, Z4, Z5, Z14, Z17, Q1, Q3, P2, P5, P10)
Rule, P. (1986). K'ung-tzu or Confucius?: The Jesuit Interpretation of Confucianism. Allen & Unwin. ISBN: 9780868619564. (Z4, Z5, Z11, Z19, P2, S7)
Hsia, R. P. (2009). A Jesuit in the Forbidden City: Matteo Ricci, 1552–1610. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199594606. (Z1, Z17, Q1, P2)
Mungello, D. E. (2012). The Catholic Invasion of China: Remaking Chinese Christianity. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN: 9781442209004. (Z2, Z5, Z15, Z16, P1, P4, Q2, S2)
Standaert, N. (Ed.). (2001). Handbook of Christianity in China. Brill. ISBN: 9789004114429. (Z2, Z6, Z15, Z16, Z18, P7, P10)
Gernet, J. (1985). China and the Christian Impact: A Conflict of Cultures. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521316873. (Z5, Z6, Z15, S4, S7)
Spence, J. D. (1998). The Memory Palace of Matteo Ricci. Penguin Books. ISBN: 9780141615769. (Z1, Z17, Q1)
The Holy Bible, New International Version. (2011). Biblica, Inc. ISBN: 9781563207075. (General scriptural principles on cultural engagement and gospel boundaries)
CHUNK 10: Credits
Host & Producer: Bob Baulch Production Company: That's Jesus Channel
PRODUCTION NOTES: All content decisions, theological positions, historical interpretations, and editorial choices are the sole responsibility of Bob Baulch and That's Jesus Channel. AI tools assist with research and drafting only.
Episode Development Assistance:
Script Development Assistance:
All AI-generated content was reviewed, edited, verified, and approved by Bob Baulch. Final authority for all historical claims, theological statements, and content accuracy rests with human editorial oversight.
Sound and Visualization: Adobe Podcast Video Production (if applicable): Adobe Premiere Pro
Digital License: Audio 1 – Background Music: "Background Music Soft Calm" by INPLUSMUSIC, Pixabay Content License, Composer: Poradovskyi Andrii (BMI IPI Number: 01055591064), Source: Pixabay, YouTube: INPLUSMUSIC Channel, Instagram: @inplusmusic
Digital License: Audio 2 – Crescendo: "Epic Trailer Short 0022 Sec" by BurtySounds, Pixabay Content License, Source: Pixabay
Production Note: Audio and video elements integrated in post-production. AI tools provide research and drafting assistance; human expertise provides final verification, theological authority, and editorial decisions. Bob Baulch assumes full responsibility for all content.