Nick and Jessa conclude their discussion of US v. Rahmen, including thoughts on the tension between proof beyond a reasonable doubt at a trial and "character of the offender" considerations at sentencing.

171: Ep.171: US v. Rahmen, Part 3

Criminal defense attorneys Jessa Nicholson Goetz and Nicholas (Nick) Gansner discuss high profile trials, defense strategies, popular culture’s fixation on crime, and all other things related to criminal justice and criminal law. We try to use actual trial records and motions to explain how a verdict is reached in cases that surprise people, and to highlight some lesser known cases. We also like to talk about bail, criminal justice reform, juvenile justice, etc. We think we are kind of funny some days, and hope you do, too. Other days, we're pretty angry, and we hope you are, too. This is unedited and low-fi, so if you're skilled in sound engineering or production, we'll probably drive you crazy (apologies in advance.)

Share 171: Ep.171: US v. Rahmen, Part 3

Sign up to save your podcasts

171: Ep.171: US v. Rahmen, Part 3

171: Ep.171: US v. Rahmen, Part 3