It isn't a fair fight but it is a nice comparison between two delicious Bourbon's.  Small Batch has a wonderful nose and Finish but I felt it lacked a little in the body.  The Full proof is well deserved of its recent World Whisky of the year 2020 win.  It is delicious and complex and at 62.5 it ought to be.

It isn't a fair fight but it is a nice comparison between two delicious Bourbon's. Small Batch has a wonderful nose and Finish but I felt it lacked a little in the body. The Full proof is well deserved of its recent World Whisky of the year 2020 win. It is delicious and complex and at 62.5 it ought to be.

It isn't a fair fight but it is a nice comparison between two delicious Bourbon's. &nbsp;Small Batch has a wonderful nose and Finish but I felt it lacked a little in the body. &nbsp;The Full proof is well deserved of its recent World Whisky of the year 2020 win. &nbsp;It is delicious and complex and at 62.5 it ought to be.

1792 Small Batch vs. Full Proof

A very unrehearsed and casual discussion of my journey with a little brown liquid called Whisk(e)y. No matter how you spell it there are amazing drams out there! Throughout this Podcast I look explore the bottles that I have been fortunate enough to collect over the years, and expand the sensory experience. My sincerest hope is to shed a little light on a particular Whisk(e)y, and maybe provide some needed information that will help you decide on YOUR next great discovery. Cheers!

Share 1792 Small Batch vs. Full Proof

Sign up to save your podcasts

1792 Small Batch vs. Full Proof

1792 Small Batch vs. Full Proof