Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share #22: Is a post-verdict evidentiary hearing required to determine a juror's competency due to admitted memory lapses during trial?
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
#22: Is a post-verdict evidentiary hearing required to determine a juror's competency due to admitted memory lapses during trial?
Daley v. J.B. Hunt Transp., Inc., 187 Conn. App. 587, 203 A.3d 635 (2019).
Summary: Nilgün Aykent Zahour analyzes the juror misconduct issues in Daley v. J.B. Hunt Transp., Inc., 187 Conn. App. 587, 203 A.3d 635 (2019). The issue we’re going to discuss is whether the trial court erred in declining to conduct a post-verdict evidentiary hearing to determine whether a juror, who suffered memory gaps with possible Alzheimer’s disease, was competent to serve on the jury.
View all episodes
By Nilgun Aykent Zahour: SM JUROR Attorney & Juror Misconduct Legal StrategistDaley v. J.B. Hunt Transp., Inc., 187 Conn. App. 587, 203 A.3d 635 (2019).
Summary: Nilgün Aykent Zahour analyzes the juror misconduct issues in Daley v. J.B. Hunt Transp., Inc., 187 Conn. App. 587, 203 A.3d 635 (2019). The issue we’re going to discuss is whether the trial court erred in declining to conduct a post-verdict evidentiary hearing to determine whether a juror, who suffered memory gaps with possible Alzheimer’s disease, was competent to serve on the jury.