Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share #23: Is a sequestered jury's fear of not being fed an adverse influence on their deliberations?
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
#23: Is a sequestered jury's fear of not being fed an adverse influence on their deliberations?
State v. Kaiser, No. A17-0571, 2018 WL 2407187 (Minn. Ct. App. May 29, 2018).
Summary: Nilgün Aykent Zahour analyzes the juror misconduct issues in State v. Kaiser, No. A17-0571, 2018 WL 2407187 (Minn. Ct. App. May 29, 2018). The issue we’re going to discuss is whether a sequestered jury’s fear of not being fed adversely influenced or pressured them in their deliberations.
View all episodes
By Nilgun Aykent Zahour: SM JUROR Attorney & Juror Misconduct Legal StrategistState v. Kaiser, No. A17-0571, 2018 WL 2407187 (Minn. Ct. App. May 29, 2018).
Summary: Nilgün Aykent Zahour analyzes the juror misconduct issues in State v. Kaiser, No. A17-0571, 2018 WL 2407187 (Minn. Ct. App. May 29, 2018). The issue we’re going to discuss is whether a sequestered jury’s fear of not being fed adversely influenced or pressured them in their deliberations.