3) Darwinism is chock full of fallacies and with a few examples from science authors including Richard Dawkins, Arthur Wallace, Georg Striedter and others, we see circular reasoning, ad hominem attacks, invalid arguments and arguments from authority.

3) Darwinism is chock full of fallacies

Darwinism—evolution by the natural selection of random mutations—is a failed 1800’s theory, created with no knowledge of modern science. Neo-Darwinists, who allegedly understand modern science, are intrepidly attempting to resuscitate this moribund theory. Darwin started off on the wrong foot. He assumes organs evolve singularly. He uses the eye as an example of how optics can change slowly. But the eye is not a vision. Vision is the optics of an eye coupled with systems of muscles, nerves, arteries and extremely complex neuropathways and neurochemistry. Darwin and Neo-Darwinists ignore the fact that the human body is an astronomically complex collection of organs, systems, and networks all communicating and interdependent.

Share 3) Darwinism is chock full of fallacies

Sign up to save your podcasts

3) Darwinism is chock full of fallacies

3) Darwinism is chock full of fallacies