Bigfoot, Sasquatch, the Yeti, and so forth. So many names for the elusive bipedal hominid that purportedly stalks the dense forests of the Pacific Northwest. We know there are many eyewitness accounts, and we also see a multitude of grainy photos posted throughout the internet supposedly showing the outline of a "Bigfoot" type figure. Some of these photos sometimes capture glimpses of the unique face of the creature, or a footprint or even the particular cone-like structure of the head that eyewitnesses say it possesses. And of course, who hasn't seen (at some point in their life) the well known Patterson-Gimlin film which lays claim to showing a female Sasquatch lumbering across a meadow in Northern California. But without a body of evidence, there is no hard information that could be dissected and analyzed for definitive proof of Bigfoot's existence. If this is the case, can science provide an answer to Bigfoot's existence, even without a Bigfoot physical body to analyze? What other elements, grounded in hard, empirical science, can be looked at for answers as to the possible existence of Sasquatch?