The proper name of  the Act is the Respect for Marriage Act.
The case, Reynolds v United States 98 US 145 (1879), proves the folly of believing that you have any religious freedom to act on your beliefs, contrary to what the supporters of this Act say. Here is a nice summary of the case here.
<a href="">https://www.oyez.org/cases/1850-1900/98us145</a>
Also a review of where we are election wise, and a path forward.

The proper name of the Act is the Respect for Marriage Act. The case, Reynolds v United States 98 US 145 (1879), proves the folly of believing that you have any religious freedom to act on your beliefs, contrary to what the supporters of this Act say. Here is a nice summary of the case here. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1850-1900/98us145 Also a review of where we are election wise, and a path forward.

The proper name of &nbsp;the Act is the Respect for Marriage Act.
The case, Reynolds v United States 98 US 145 (1879), proves the folly of believing that you have any religious freedom to act on your beliefs, contrary to what the supporters of this Act say. Here is a nice summary of the case here.
<a href="" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.oyez.org/cases/1850-1900/98us145</a>
Also a review of where we are election wise, and a path forward.

37. November 16, 2022

The Lib features commentary from a converted conservative, now libertarian's point of view. Included is an MLS in Poli Sci to back it up, but the views are learned from experience, hardened by schooling.

Share 37. November 16, 2022

Sign up to save your podcasts

37. November 16, 2022

37. November 16, 2022