Why are annual sales targets "irrelevant" once they are set?

Annual sales targets often feel like the main event, but this script argues they are already decided: "The targets for the year are already set or will be set shortly". Because the number is locked in, therefore obsessing over it does not change your daily behaviour, your sales conversations, or your results. What matters is what you will do to improve yourself this year so hitting those targets becomes "more certain and easier to do".

The practical warning is about momentum without reflection. We "roll one year into the next" and keep operating without "interventions to recalibrate what we are doing and why we are doing it". Because habits drive behaviour, therefore bad habits become "the enemy of progress". The next step is to identify the habits that reduce results and ditch them on purpose. Mini-summary: Targets do not create results. Habits and interventions create results.

How does a "victim mentality" form in sales, and why does it hold people back?

The script frames a common pathway into sales: "Sales is the refuge of failures from other jobs." People lose a job, companies always need salespeople, and they "find themselves in a sales job". Because they "get no training", therefore "the job is horrible", and confidence takes a hit.

That is where mindset collapses into identity. The text describes "chains of low esteem and low self confidence", and says it becomes hard to break free. This matters because sales is a communication profession. If you approach buyers with low self-belief, therefore you will avoid control, accept poor meeting structures, and fall back on pitching instead of diagnosing needs. The intervention is simple and direct: "Decide you will become a professional." Mini-summary: No training creates pain, pain creates low confidence, and low confidence keeps you unskilled. Decide to be professional to interrupt the cycle.

What does "study sales and communication" actually mean in practice?

The script is specific: if you cannot read, "listen to audio or watch videos". Because there is "so much free content marketing pieces available out there today", therefore access is not the barrier. The barrier is the decision to take learning seriously and make it routine.

It then pushes beyond free learning to paid training: "Get yourself on a sales training course and even if you have to borrow money to go on that course, do it". The reason is outcome-based: "the investment will repay you a hundred fold and more". The text even offers a named option: "Naturally I recommend a Dale Carnegie sales course for you, but at least get training." Because training upgrades skill and confidence, therefore the "difference is night and day" and so is the "money flow" that comes back as a result. Mini-summary: Use any learning format you can sustain, then commit to structured training because skills change outcomes fast.

What is "kokorogame" and why does "true intention" change sales results?

"Kokorogame" is translated as "true intention" and is treated as pre-performance preparation. The script uses Japanese cultural examples: in martial arts "we meditate", in flower arranging "the master strips the flower stems", and in shodo "the calligraphy expert rubs the ink stone". Because these rituals set the mind for the task, therefore they improve the quality of what follows.

Sales is framed the same way. Before you sell, the fundamental question is: "Why are we selling? Is it to make ourselves money or make the client money?" Because your intention shapes your behaviour, therefore the answer triggers "a chain reaction of further decisions and actions". That chain defines whether you are "professionals or transients in the world of selling". If your intention is client-centred, therefore your questions, pacing, and recommendations become more useful and more credible. Mini-summary: "Kokorogame" is mental set-up. Intention drives decisions, and decisions drive behaviour in sales conversations.

Why is buyer-controlled selling "ridiculous" in Japan, and what should replace it?

The script makes a strong claim: "In Japan, in 99% of cases, the buyer controls the sales conversation and this is just ridiculous." The reason is role clarity. "The salesperson's job is to help the buyer make the best decision to advance their business." Because buyers are busy and have blind spots, therefore leaving them to "self-service" produces weak decisions and weak outcomes.

The corrective is also direct: "Decide to control the sale conversation." That does not mean dominating the buyer. It means structuring the conversation so the buyer reaches a better decision faster. If the salesperson does not lead, the script says it "only happens when the salesperson is inadequate and untrained". Training and professionalism therefore show up as meeting control: the ability to guide, clarify, and then present the right solution. Mini-summary: Buyer control leads to self-service and poor decisions. Sales leadership means guiding the decision process, not delivering a random pitch.

How do you stop being a "pitchperson" and start selling with questions?

The mechanism is permission and diagnosis. The script says we need to "ask questions of the buyer to find out (A) do we have what they need and (B) if we do have it, then present the solution" so the client thinks, "fantastic – this is just what we need". Because questions reveal needs, therefore you can match your solution to the buyer's real situation, not their surface request.

The obstacle is cultural and behavioural: "we will be dragged into the mud and the blood of giving our pitch by the buyer unless we get their permission to ask them questions." It labels the pattern: "Japanese salespeople are pitchpeople not salespeople." The logic is blunt: "How on earth do you know what the client needs unless you ask them questions first? Well you don't". Because "the buyer is God and God demands the pitch", therefore the salesperson must "intervene and redirect the conversation." Once you have permission to ask questions, "life gets good and you will get sales." Mini-summary: Permission to question is the turning point. Questions replace guesswork, and control replaces pitching.

Why does pitching fail as a primary sales strategy?

Pitching is described as luck: "a very tenuous way of striking it lucky and happen to chance upon what the buyer wants." Because pitching is not diagnosis, therefore it depends on coincidence rather than clarity. You might hit a buyer's need by accident, but that is not a repeatable method for consistent sales performance.

The script concludes that if you only focus on three things, you become "much more professional and skilful": attitude, skill, then product knowledge on top. The three themes are: decide to become professional, train sales and communication, and control the sales conversation through permission-based questioning. Because these are foundational behaviours, therefore product knowledge becomes more powerful instead of being wasted in a generic pitch. Mini-summary: Pitching is guessing. Professionalism, training, and question-led control make selling repeatable.

Author Bio The author writes about selling and communication in Japan, including "kokorogame" (true intention) and how salespeople can shift from pitching to professional, question-led selling. The author also wrote about these ideas in the book Japan Sales Mastery and recommends structured sales training, including a Dale Carnegie sales course, to lift skill, confidence, and outcomes.