"The depth of the NEW-WORLD-ORDER deception reaches to the very Bibles that sit in their quasi courts that control our minds... Grammatical Deceptions that remove God from the bibles and replace such a God with corporate private banking administrators..."

"The old name before the printing Industry sort of re defined the text into a modern day presumption of the differences, was "Descriptive text" and "Symbolic text". When using "SIGN language, it was accepted to use the standard "uppercase" text (Symbolic) because true sign was symbolic text but only in the small letter size, rendering another type font cabinet altogether! ... This small SIGN-LANGUAGE (GLOSSA) text is found in the King James Bible where the word "LORD" appears in the GLOSSA sign text and in a grammatical sense, removes such a word from the center or main content of the body of text, into the margin, grammatically removing it from the main content of the bible! ... (Removing it from the Bible)

The letters are not the problem, its how they are being used that makes them so dangerous..."

"Just remember, your name on the birth certificate is just your Christian name. The name: "John Henry Doe" is not the correct name of the name: "John Henry" appearing on the Birth Certificate. "John Henry Doe" is an incorporated name that incorporates the family name and the given name or Christian name together as one proper noun, being a name. Might be a good idea to ask the Magistrate who is the copyright owner of the full name: "John Henry Doe" because the only evidence of your true correct name is only "John Henry". You-see, Satin is the god of all incorporated entities, being the pure name of Christ attached to another name, destroying the original name, so even though the Vatican may not have copyright over "John Henry" or "Doe", the Vatican may hold the copyright over the incorporated name being the "corporation" of John Henry and the Doe name. So if you think they got your name correct or appearing in proper English, as a proper noun, make sure that you know the difference between your name and the State name because you may have a right to be saved under the Christian name: "John Henry" being your true correct name according to their documents, but if you assume that "John Henry Doe" is your name, you may be mistaken and ignorantly be holding the copyright property of the Vatican.... so ask the magistrate if the full name that incorporates the family name with the given name, is the copyright property of the State. If he doesn't want to answer, ask him if the refusal to give full disclosure in relation to who owns the copyright to the incorporated name on any charge sheet, renders an Estopple by Conduct, giving the court the right to remain silence but for a compensation charge (License to remain silent) of what ever you deem it should be for being forced or deceived into acting as account holder (Trustee) of the State copyright property. Trustee's must be compensated. Is your true name: "John Henry" being deceived into holding the State owned name: "John Henry Doe" as trustee?..."

"The point in this video is not about the Bible, its about inserting debased Latin text with English descriptive text. They are two different languages in reality and don't have correspondence with each other. Why did they do that? ..."

"I have spent 7 years trying to prove just that, that the all uppercase Latin based style of text appears as a part of the English style, but I can't prove it, all I have done is proved the opposite, that it has no correspondence with the English style of text in any way. evidenced by the first three lines of type on page 666, Chicago Manual of Styles, seventeenth edition and then people like you come here and make such a claim without your evidence???? you're a wast of time! or was this just your ignorant "presumption" based on what you recon??? without any research??? ... if you don't have the evidence to back up your claim than you are the illiterate idiot that deserves to lose your royalty payments for all the mineral and energy wealth sold to foreign accounts without your knowledge. Answer one question, is the name on your driver license your name??? ... Its written in all uppercase text, that does not constitute a proper noun in relation to every English styles manual that I am aware of, so answer the question, lets see just how much you know about simple grammar, simple question! ... This is a research channel, not a self opinionated idiot channel, show us what you have found for the benefit of all of us in order to back up your claim please! ..."

"First, You are not an idiot if you do the research but one that makes claims without researching the topic, than you may be the idiot, I was also an idiot for many years by way of assuming things that I had never researched. In relation to "font" as long as the font contains all the symbols of the language being used, I "assume" that the font is not really effecting the grammar or syntax on the condition that the font contains all the relevant symbols that can construct the written form in relation to the English style.

As typo's or bad spelling, I am no great reader or speller, in other words, I may not be the cleverest reader or writer, however, the point made in this research deals with the style manuals, the science of the construction of the document, not the fonts or the spelling or related mistakes relating to those sections of what is being said, this research relates to the "style or syntax" of how the words appear. One capital letter at the beginning of a word constitutes a "name" or a proper noun but two or more capitals next to each other in a word is no part of the English constitution. It may be used for the "margin" in order that the margin can never be mistaken for the context, however, the illiterate may make this mistake and assume that the marginal text is a part of the context, and from what I "assume" this may be a deliberate act by merchant bankers or pirates in order to deceive the masses into accepting false contracts or charges or bills for the benefit of such a foreign entity??? ...

If you become aware of this science relating to the grammatical standing of a word or sentence, a court charge can fall into an "estopple by conduct" (It stops and can't move!!) until the court or magistrate explains the anomaly appearing on the charge sheet in relation to a question dealing with its grammatical standing, as what has happened in "every" court hearing I have ever been dragged into! ... Writing or a written document "is what it is" grammatically and if you see the grammatical glitch, that most people do not see, than such a document can only stand as what it is and can never stand as it may be "assumed" ... This is a maxim, "the fact negates the presumption" and if the the grammatical fact appears in a document appearing before a magistrate, no magistrate can rule against the "maxim" ... I guess you could say that knowledge of grammar is "power" to shut down a foreign court, shut down a foreign bank, shut down a pirate? ..."

"Thanks, well put because your right, it does go a lot further than just speaking about the Bible... SIGN is everywhere, even every SIGN in the street is only talking to the marginal debtors... its not talking to the house of Christ... Thanks for your input, ... Cheers, Rom"

"First, You are not an idiot if you do the research but one that makes claims without researching the topic, than you may be the idiot, I was also an idiot for many years by way of assuming things that I had never researched. In relation to "font" as long as the font contains all the symbols of the language being used, I "assume" that the font is not really effecting the grammar or syntax on the condition that the font contains all the relevant symbols that can construct the written form in relation to the English style.

As typo's or bad spelling, I am no great reader or speller, in other words, I may not be the cleverest reader or writer, however, the point made in this research deals with the style manuals, the science of the construction of the document, not the fonts or the spelling or related mistakes relating to those sections of what is being said, this research relates to the "style or syntax" of how the words appear. One capital letter at the beginning of a word constitutes a "name" or a proper noun but two or more capitals next to each other in a word is no part of the English constitution. It may be used for the "margin" in order that the margin can never be mistaken for the context, however, the illiterate may make this mistake and assume that the marginal text is a part of the context, and from what I "assume" this may be a deliberate act by merchant bankers or pirates in order to deceive the masses into accepting false contracts or charges or bills for the benefit of such a foreign entity??? ...

If you become aware of this science relating to the grammatical standing of a word or sentence, a court charge can fall into an "estopple by conduct" (It stops and can't move!!) until the court or magistrate explains the anomaly appearing on the charge sheet in relation to a question dealing with its grammatical standing, as what has happened in "every" court hearing I have ever been dragged into! ... Writing or a written document "is what it is" grammatically and if you see the grammatical glitch, that most people do not see, than such a document can only stand as what it is and can never stand as it may be "assumed" ... This is a maxim, "the fact negates the presumption" and if the the grammatical fact appears in a document appearing before a magistrate, no magistrate can rule against the "maxim" ... I guess you could say that knowledge of grammar is "power" to shut down a foreign court, shut down a foreign bank, shut down a pirate? ."