
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us Fan Mail
Today’s show had that “debate day” energy right from the start—Neal Larson and Julie Mason set the table for a live legislative debate in Idaho House District 32B between appointed incumbent Representative **Aaron Bingham** and challenger **Brian McKellar**. Before bringing the candidates in, they walked through the bigger news cycle too: cautious optimism that the Trump administration might be nearing a deal with Iran, discussion about leverage around the Strait of Hormuz and uranium enrichment as key non‑negotiables, and a brief but pointed take on the political undertones of the Pope/Trump back-and-forth—plus some commentary about how online outrage cycles can consume people. Then it was straight into the studio setup, Facebook Live logistics, and the format rules for a structured, timed debate.
In the debate, immigration, education, budgets, and healthcare took center stage. Bingham defended her “no” votes on several immigration enforcement bills as concerns over unfunded mandates and constitutionality (including her criticism of HB 700), while McKellar argued for stronger employment enforcement like E‑Verify and said legal pathways already exist for agriculture. On education, Bingham said she supports choice in principle but would have opposed House Bill 93 due to guardrails, transparency, and accountability concerns; McKellar backed HB 93 enthusiastically and supported expanding the cap if demand continues. From there, the conversation turned to budget philosophy (across-the-board cuts vs. line‑item scrutiny), Medicaid expansion and work requirements, and even ways to lower healthcare costs—where both candidates found some common ground, including discussion of cash-pay approaches (and Bingham noted she helped pass a related bill, HB 929). The closing moments included candidate-to-candidate questions—McKellar pressed Bingham on a vote related to internet crimes against children funding, while Bingham asked McKellar what the legislature did well and poorly—before final statements, with Bingham highlighting her push to schedule kratom (“gas station heroin”) and McKellar emphasizing conservative accountability and enforcement priorities.
- District 32B debate setup: incumbent appointee **Aaron Bingham** vs. challenger **Brian McKellar**
- Immigration clash: unfunded mandates/constitutionality vs. E‑Verify and employer accountability
- School choice: Bingham supports choice but wanted tighter guardrails; McKellar supports HB 93 and expansion
- Budget debate: across-the-board cuts vs. line-item cuts; transportation and vulnerable programs mentioned
- Medicaid expansion disagreements, plus shared interest in lowering healthcare costs through cash-pay reforms
- Bingham’s closing focus: scheduling **kratom** as a controlled substance to address overdose concerns
Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?
You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.
Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.
By Neal Larson3
22 ratings
Send us Fan Mail
Today’s show had that “debate day” energy right from the start—Neal Larson and Julie Mason set the table for a live legislative debate in Idaho House District 32B between appointed incumbent Representative **Aaron Bingham** and challenger **Brian McKellar**. Before bringing the candidates in, they walked through the bigger news cycle too: cautious optimism that the Trump administration might be nearing a deal with Iran, discussion about leverage around the Strait of Hormuz and uranium enrichment as key non‑negotiables, and a brief but pointed take on the political undertones of the Pope/Trump back-and-forth—plus some commentary about how online outrage cycles can consume people. Then it was straight into the studio setup, Facebook Live logistics, and the format rules for a structured, timed debate.
In the debate, immigration, education, budgets, and healthcare took center stage. Bingham defended her “no” votes on several immigration enforcement bills as concerns over unfunded mandates and constitutionality (including her criticism of HB 700), while McKellar argued for stronger employment enforcement like E‑Verify and said legal pathways already exist for agriculture. On education, Bingham said she supports choice in principle but would have opposed House Bill 93 due to guardrails, transparency, and accountability concerns; McKellar backed HB 93 enthusiastically and supported expanding the cap if demand continues. From there, the conversation turned to budget philosophy (across-the-board cuts vs. line‑item scrutiny), Medicaid expansion and work requirements, and even ways to lower healthcare costs—where both candidates found some common ground, including discussion of cash-pay approaches (and Bingham noted she helped pass a related bill, HB 929). The closing moments included candidate-to-candidate questions—McKellar pressed Bingham on a vote related to internet crimes against children funding, while Bingham asked McKellar what the legislature did well and poorly—before final statements, with Bingham highlighting her push to schedule kratom (“gas station heroin”) and McKellar emphasizing conservative accountability and enforcement priorities.
- District 32B debate setup: incumbent appointee **Aaron Bingham** vs. challenger **Brian McKellar**
- Immigration clash: unfunded mandates/constitutionality vs. E‑Verify and employer accountability
- School choice: Bingham supports choice but wanted tighter guardrails; McKellar supports HB 93 and expansion
- Budget debate: across-the-board cuts vs. line-item cuts; transportation and vulnerable programs mentioned
- Medicaid expansion disagreements, plus shared interest in lowering healthcare costs through cash-pay reforms
- Bingham’s closing focus: scheduling **kratom** as a controlled substance to address overdose concerns
Let’s talk advertising. When you want to advertise on the radio, you call the station, right? But what about Facebook, Instagram, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, and other streaming platforms?
You could try clicking around, reading books, or taking online courses to figure it out—or you can let us handle it. At Sandhill Media Group, we’re your local experts in both radio and digital marketing.
Visit SandhillMediaGroup.com today.