
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Here's an article about the new reality with 5-Star Reviews:
Article Provided by Home Pro Go / HomeProGoInc.com
The Ethical Dilemma:Should Membership Sites Allow Subscribers to Edit or Delete Customer Feedback?In the realm of online businesses, customer
feedback is a vital element. It provides businesses with valuable insights
about their products or services and can significantly influence the
decision-making process of potential customers. However, the question of
whether membership sites should allow subscribers to edit or delete customer
feedback that isn't rated as five stars is a contentious one.
The Power of ReviewsIn the Product Launch Formula (PLF), Jeff
Walker emphasizes the importance of 'Social Proof' as a mental trigger. This
refers to the influence that the actions and opinions of others have on our
decision-making process. When potential customers see that a product or service
has received positive feedback from others, they are more likely to purchase
it. However, this works both ways. Negative reviews can discourage potential
customers from buying.
The Case for Allowing Edits and DeletionsSome argue that allowing subscribers to delete
or edit customer feedback provides them with a way to manage their online
reputation. They can remove unjust or false negative reviews that could harm
their business. Similarly, it allows them to correct any misinformation that
may be present in the reviews.
The Case Against Allowing Edits and DeletionsOn the other hand, allowing businesses to
manipulate customer feedback can lead to a lack of transparency and trust. It
creates an environment where potential customers may not get a complete and
accurate picture of the product or service. This goes against the core
principle of 'Reciprocity' that Jeff Walker teaches in PLF, where businesses
should strive to serve their audience with value.
A Balanced ApproachA balanced approach might involve giving
subscribers the ability to respond to negative reviews publicly, addressing the
concerns raised and demonstrating their commitment to customer satisfaction.
This approach maintains transparency, provides businesses with a means to
protect their reputation, and follows the principles of 'Opportunity',
'Transformation' and 'Ownership Experience' as laid out in the PLF.
In ConclusionWhile it's important for businesses to have
control over their online image, maintaining trust and transparency with
potential customers is paramount. A balanced approach that allows for public
responses to negative reviews upholds the integrity of the review process,
embodies the principles of PLF and can lead to a positive 'Ownership
Experience' for customers.
Remember, at the heart of every successful
product launch and online business is a deep understanding of your avatar
(ideal customer) and a commitment to providing value and positive
transformation. This commitment should extend to how you handle customer
feedback.
Here's the link to the Forbes article about the skills assessment:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeshumanresourcescouncil/2024/02/27/optimizing-workforce-efficiency-data-entry-and-typing-tests/?sh=b5affe229715
Here's an article about the new reality with 5-Star Reviews:
Article Provided by Home Pro Go / HomeProGoInc.com
The Ethical Dilemma:Should Membership Sites Allow Subscribers to Edit or Delete Customer Feedback?In the realm of online businesses, customer
feedback is a vital element. It provides businesses with valuable insights
about their products or services and can significantly influence the
decision-making process of potential customers. However, the question of
whether membership sites should allow subscribers to edit or delete customer
feedback that isn't rated as five stars is a contentious one.
The Power of ReviewsIn the Product Launch Formula (PLF), Jeff
Walker emphasizes the importance of 'Social Proof' as a mental trigger. This
refers to the influence that the actions and opinions of others have on our
decision-making process. When potential customers see that a product or service
has received positive feedback from others, they are more likely to purchase
it. However, this works both ways. Negative reviews can discourage potential
customers from buying.
The Case for Allowing Edits and DeletionsSome argue that allowing subscribers to delete
or edit customer feedback provides them with a way to manage their online
reputation. They can remove unjust or false negative reviews that could harm
their business. Similarly, it allows them to correct any misinformation that
may be present in the reviews.
The Case Against Allowing Edits and DeletionsOn the other hand, allowing businesses to
manipulate customer feedback can lead to a lack of transparency and trust. It
creates an environment where potential customers may not get a complete and
accurate picture of the product or service. This goes against the core
principle of 'Reciprocity' that Jeff Walker teaches in PLF, where businesses
should strive to serve their audience with value.
A Balanced ApproachA balanced approach might involve giving
subscribers the ability to respond to negative reviews publicly, addressing the
concerns raised and demonstrating their commitment to customer satisfaction.
This approach maintains transparency, provides businesses with a means to
protect their reputation, and follows the principles of 'Opportunity',
'Transformation' and 'Ownership Experience' as laid out in the PLF.
In ConclusionWhile it's important for businesses to have
control over their online image, maintaining trust and transparency with
potential customers is paramount. A balanced approach that allows for public
responses to negative reviews upholds the integrity of the review process,
embodies the principles of PLF and can lead to a positive 'Ownership
Experience' for customers.
Remember, at the heart of every successful
product launch and online business is a deep understanding of your avatar
(ideal customer) and a commitment to providing value and positive
transformation. This commitment should extend to how you handle customer
feedback.
Here's the link to the Forbes article about the skills assessment:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeshumanresourcescouncil/2024/02/27/optimizing-workforce-efficiency-data-entry-and-typing-tests/?sh=b5affe229715