In this episode of the Proper Lookout Podcast, Laura D’Alessandri and Eden Christopher discuss the recent High Court decision of Lee v Lee; Hsu v RACQ Insurance Limited; Lee v RACQ Insurance Limited [2019] HCA 28 (4 September 2019). In particular, they look at the High Court's take on how the Court of Appeal ought to approach the trial judge's advantage.

In this episode of the Proper Lookout Podcast, Laura D’Alessandri and Eden Christopher discuss the recent High Court decision of Lee v Lee; Hsu v RACQ Insurance Limited; Lee v RACQ Insurance Limited [2019] HCA 28 (4 September 2019). In particular, they look at the High Court's take on how the Court of Appeal ought to approach the trial judge's advantage.

In this episode of the Proper Lookout Podcast,&nbsp;Laura D’Alessandri&nbsp;and&nbsp;Eden Christopher&nbsp;discuss the recent High Court&nbsp;decision of Lee v Lee; Hsu v RACQ Insurance Limited; Lee v RACQ Insurance Limited [2019] HCA 28 (4 September 2019). In particular, they look at the High Court's take on how the Court of Appeal ought to approach the trial judge's advantage.

#56 – Who was the driver? The High Court discusses the glaringly improbable

Welcome to the The Proper Lookout Podcast published by the Statutory Insurance Group of McCabes. In this series, our CTP experts discuss a range of topics – sharing their thoughts on an industry trend or intriguing legal issue, explaining the intricacies of an important case, and hopefully imparting some of the knowledge they have gained.

Share #56 – Who was the driver? The High Court discusses the glaringly improbable

Sign up to save your podcasts

#56 – Who was the driver? The High Court discusses the glaringly improbable

#56 – Who was the driver? The High Court discusses the glaringly improbable