Tired of keeping up with all the CJEU case law? Want to prepare  yourself for all the cool discussions at the IAPP Brussels event? Not to worry! The Joost’s Case Corner covering the CJEU Super Friday cases has landed for you to enjoy. In the first of two of the Super Friday episodes, we will cover:

• Case C-21/23 Lindenapotheke (What is Art 9 data and what’s not? Can companies rat out each other regarding compliance with the GDPR (and is it smart)?)

• Case C-621/22 KNLT (Can a commercial interest constitute legitimate interest? We also get a brief history of this case and learn to understand the Dutch DPA a bit better and cover some hot tea on the subject.)

• Case C-446/21 Schrems v Facebook (Can you process publicly disclosed information on sexual orientation for targeted advertising just because it is public information?)

We also learn about the most awesome Dutch legal term “breaking through the wall” and Olaus Petri (a priest who lived 1493-1552, in Swedish Olof Persson, who is still an important character in Finnish law) while discussing legal theory of EU law. 

So take a good breath, let all the stress of November leave your mind, and enjoy the awesome drama that is CJEU case law!

 

Links:

Case C-21/23 Lindenapotheke

https://curia.europa.eu/juris/documents.jsf?num=C-21/23

Case C-621/22 KNLT https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=290688&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=4086618

Case C-446/21 Schrems v Facebook https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62021CJ0446

 

Did you enjoy our show? Support us by buying us a pumpkin spice latte here: https://bmc.link/privacypod4u

We would love to get feedback – so please tag us, follow us, DM us, or send us traditional email:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/PodPrivacy, #privacypod

Instagram: @privacypod

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tietosuojapod/about/

Email: [email protected]