Jessa and Nick's differing conclusions about Scott Peterson's guilt/conviction cause them to examine what biases they're bringing to the table when listening to evidence.  Also, the trial.

Jessa and Nick's differing conclusions about Scott Peterson's guilt/conviction cause them to examine what biases they're bringing to the table when listening to evidence. Also, the trial.

Jessa and Nick's differing conclusions about Scott Peterson's guilt/conviction cause them to examine what biases they're bringing to the table when listening to evidence.&nbsp; Also, the trial.

70: Ep. 70: Scott Peterson, Part 2: Just How Biased Are We?

Criminal defense attorneys Jessa Nicholson Goetz and Nicholas (Nick) Gansner discuss high profile trials, defense strategies, popular culture’s fixation on crime, and all other things related to criminal justice and criminal law. We try to use actual trial records and motions to explain how a verdict is reached in cases that surprise people, and to highlight some lesser known cases. We also like to talk about bail, criminal justice reform, juvenile justice, etc. We think we are kind of funny some days, and hope you do, too. Other days, we're pretty angry, and we hope you are, too. This is unedited and low-fi, so if you're skilled in sound engineering or production, we'll probably drive you crazy (apologies in advance.)

Share 70: Ep. 70: Scott Peterson, Part 2: Just How Biased Are We?

Sign up to save your podcasts

70: Ep. 70: Scott Peterson, Part 2: Just How Biased Are We?

70: Ep. 70: Scott Peterson, Part 2: Just How Biased Are We?