Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share 730 AD – John Defends Icons -Faithful Art Reflects Jesus’ Incarnation Today
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
730 AD – John Defends Icons -Faithful Art Reflects Jesus’ Incarnation Today
730 AD – John Defends Icons: Faithful Art Reflects Jesus’ Incarnation Today
Published 9/10/2025
Cold Hook 1:21
Show Intro 1:17
Narrative Foundation 1:50
Narrative Development 1:52
Climax & Impact 1:53
Legacy & Relevance 1:23
Reflection & Call 1:22
Outro 1:08
Metadata
In 730 AD, John of Damascus, a monk near Jerusalem, defied Emperor Leo III’s ban on icons. His Three Treatises on the Divine Images argued that depicting Jesus affirmed His incarnation—God made visible. Icons weren’t idols but windows to Christ, like how family photos remind us of loved ones. His writings gave believers language to resist icon smashing, assuring them they were not betraying God but honoring the Word made flesh. John also composed hymns still sung today, weaving theology into worship. Though the emperor tried to silence him, John’s words endured, shaping the Second Council of Nicaea (787), which upheld veneration of icons. His legacy reminds us that worship is never about style—chant, hymn, or guitar—but about Jesus Himself. This episode challenges us to honor Christ in every form of devotion, seeing beauty not as an idol but as a testimony to the God who became flesh.
Keywords (≤500 characters)
John of Damascus, iconoclasm, defense of icons, Three Treatises on the Divine Images, Leo III, Byzantine icon ban, Second Council of Nicaea, Christian art, incarnation, Eastern Orthodox tradition, veneration vs worship, visual theology, Byzantine history, 8th century Christianity, hymn writer, Jerusalem monastery, icons, Christian worship, council of Nicaea II
Hashtags
#ChurchHistory #JohnofDamascus #Icons #Byzantine #OrthodoxFaith
Script Chunks
Cold Hook
The decree came like a hammer from Constantinople [kon-stan-TEE-noh-pul]. Emperor Leo III had spoken: the holy images that filled churches—the icons of Christ, the saints, scenes from scripture—they were to be destroyed. For generations, believers had prayed before them, not as idols, but as reminders of the God who became visible in Jesus.
Now soldiers tore them from walls, smashed them in the streets, and mocked those who wept. In one village, worshipers walked into church to find blank walls where saints once looked back at them. For the first time, children saw plaster instead of the story.
Most stayed silent, afraid of imperial power. But in a monastery near Jerusalem [jer-uh-SAH-lum], one voice refused to be silenced. John of Damascus [duh-MAS-kus], a scholar and hymn writer, took up his pen.
His Three Treatises on the Divine Images defended what emperors sought to erase. He argued that to honor Christ’s image was to honor His incarnation—that God took on flesh, and therefore could be pictured. This was no academic debate. It was faith under siege, fought not with swords, but with ink and conviction.
Show Intro
From the That’s Jesus Channel, welcome to COACH—Church Origins and Church History.
I’m Bob Baulch.
On Wednesdays, we stay between 500 and 1500 AD.
Today we turn to the year 730, when an emperor tried to erase the images of Jesus from the life of the church—and one man dared to answer. John of Damascus, writing from his monastery near Jerusalem, defended the use of icons at a time when Emperor Leo III had banned them.
To Leo, images were dangerous, too close to idolatry. But to John, they were reminders of the Word made flesh—that the invisible God had become visible in Jesus. His Three Treatises on the Divine Images spread quickly, strengthening resistance to icon smashing and shaping worship for centuries to come.
This was more than art. It was about how believers remembered Jesus and confessed His presence in their midst.
Narrative Foundation
By the early eighth century, tension in the Byzantine Empire was rising. Emperor Leo III had issued an edict: icons—the painted images of Jesus, Mary, and the saints—were to be banned. He believed such images broke the commandment against idolatry. Soldiers obeyed by tearing icons from churches and burning them in public squares.
But for many Christians, icons weren’t idols. They were windows into the story of salvation. An image of Jesus at His baptism reminded them that God had entered human history. A painting of Mary holding her child spoke of the mystery of the incarnation. To pray in front of these images was not to worship wood and paint but to remember the Savior who had come in flesh.
It’s like deleting every photo of your family from your phone. You don’t worship those pixels—but without them, something important is missing.
Into this storm stepped John of Damascus. Living under Muslim rule near Jerusalem, he was out of reach of the emperor’s direct power. That gave him freedom to speak when others were silenced. John was already respected as a theologian and hymn writer. His words carried weight.
QUOTE: “I do not worship matter, but the Creator of matter, who became matter for my sake.” In 730, he wrote his Three Treatises, arguing that if Jesus truly became man—visible, touchable—then it was right for Christians to depict Him.
Narrative Development
John of Damascus built his case with bold clarity. He reminded readers of the Old Testament’s warnings against idols—but then pointed to the New Testament, where God Himself took on a human face.
QUOTE: “In former times, God, who is without form, could in no way be represented. But now, when God is seen in the flesh, I make an image of the God who can be seen.”
For John, the heart of the matter was Jesus’ incarnation. If the Word truly became flesh, then Christians could paint Him without blasphemy. To forbid His image was, in John’s eyes, to strip away part of the gospel.
When John wrote hymns like “Come, Ye Faithful, Raise the Strain,” believers weren’t just singing poetry—they were singing theology: that Christ really lived, died, and rose in the flesh.
His writings also explained how icons functioned in devotion. They were not worshiped but honored—much like a Christian might kiss a Bible, not as an object of power but as a sign of love for the One it revealed. Icons trained the eye to look beyond paint to the greater reality: Jesus reigning at the right hand of the Father.
John’s treatises spread among monks, carried across the empire. In dark days when emperors demanded silence, his words became a lifeline for believers who longed to keep beauty in their worship.
Climax & Immediate Impact
John of Damascus could not swing a sword against Emperor Leo III, but his pen cut deep. His treatises reached Christian communities torn by fear. Soldiers had already smashed sacred images in churches, and many leaders stayed silent to survive. Yet John’s arguments gave ordinary believers language to defend what they cherished.
In monasteries, his words were copied and read aloud. They fueled resistance to imperial decrees, assuring the faithful that honoring icons was not betrayal but confession of Jesus’ incarnation. Far from idolatry, it was an act of witness.
The emperor, furious at John’s defiance, tried to discredit him. Stories tell that Leo forged a letter to the caliph in Damascus, accusing John of treason. John was punished, his hand severed—yet even here legend says God restored it, and John returned to writing hymns and prayers. Whether embellished or not, the story captured his courage.
Leo’s soldiers could smash wood and plaster in a day. But John’s words—copied by monks on scraps of parchment—outlasted emperors and still echo in churches a thousand years later.
It turns out ink has a longer shelf life than an emperor’s temper. Because, in the short term, iconoclasm still spread. But John’s defense planted seeds that later bore fruit. The Second Council of Nicaea (787) declared that icons could be venerated, for they lead believers to contemplation of divine realities.
[AD BREAK]
Legacy & Modern Relevance
John’s legacy endures. His defense of icons shaped more than artwork—it preserved a way of seeing Jesus’ incarnation. The council at Nicaea affirmed, “We define that the holy icons… should be given due veneration, not worship.” By rooting his argument in the reality that God became visible in Jesus, he secured space for beauty in worship.
That truth still echoes. Every generation wrestles with worship. In Paul’s day, believers were told to “sing to one another” from the heart. Centuries later, chants filled basilicas. Instruments entered slowly, debated fiercely. Hymns rose in the Reformation. Gospel songs, revival anthems, and contemporary praise bands followed.
Each wave asked, What does it mean to sing? The form shifted, but the posture was constant: worship that flows from the heart. John’s courage reminds us that style is not the enemy—forgetting the heart is. Icons, hymns, or guitars only matter if they draw us toward Jesus.
Reflection & Call to Action
John of Damascus risked everything to defend a truth greater than paint or stone. He reminded the church that worship is never about the medium—it is about Jesus. The danger is not in using icons, hymns, or instruments. The danger is when we let the form eclipse the One it points to.
So what about us? Do we argue over styles while missing the Savior? Do we fight for preference while forgetting presence? Paul never defined worship by tempo or melody—he described it as hearts overflowing with gratitude.
John’s courage presses us to ask: when culture, power, or even fellow believers challenge our devotion, will we stay silent? Or will we speak, gently but firmly, of the Jesus we cannot deny?
Guarding worship means guarding our hearts. It means remembering that whether we lift our voices with ancient chants or modern choruses, the purpose is the same: to honor the God who became flesh, dwelt among us, and is worthy of praise forever.
Outro
If this story of John of Damascus defending icons challenged or encouraged you, would you consider sharing this episode with a friend? You never know who might need to hear it. And while you’re at it, leaving a review on your podcast app really helps others discover COACH.
Be sure to follow for weekly episodes. References and even contrary opinions are always linked in the show notes. We’ve also placed Amazon links to helpful resources—at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
You can also find COACH episodes on YouTube at the That’s Jesus Channel.
Next time, we’ll explore another turning point where believers faced pressure to compromise their worship.
Thanks for listening to COACH – Church Origins and Church History. I’m Bob Baulch with the That’s Jesus Channel. Have a great day—and be blessed. Honestly, more people probably kiss their phone screens each day than ever kissed an icon—but I won’t be writing three treatises about that.
References
Quotes
Z-Notes (Zero Dispute)
Z1: John of Damascus was a Christian monk and theologian active in the early 8th century near Jerusalem.
Z2: He authored Three Treatises on the Divine Images in defense of icons.
Z3: His argument grounded icon veneration in the incarnation of Jesus Christ.
Z4: He distinguished between veneration (honor) and worship due to God alone.
Z5: Emperor Leo III initiated imperial action against icons in the 8th century.
Z6: The icon controversy is called Byzantine Iconoclasm.
Z7: John wrote outside direct Byzantine control.
Z8: His treatises circulated in monasteries and churches.
Z9: The Second Council of Nicaea (787) restored veneration of icons.
Z10: Nicaea II affirmed that icons direct believers toward divine realities.
Z11: John is also remembered for his hymns, still used in Eastern worship.
Z12: The veneration/worship distinction became standard in Orthodox theology.
POPs (Parallel Orthodox Perspectives)
P1: The Council of Chalcedon (451) affirmed Christ’s full humanity and divinity, supporting John’s reasoning that He could be depicted [6].
P2: Paul urged believers to focus on “Christ in you, the hope of glory” (Colossians 1:27) [8].
P3: Justin Martyr described the Eucharist using material elements as carriers of grace [7].
P4: Later Orthodox theology tied icons directly to the incarnation, echoing John’s work [9][12].
P5: Nicaea II (787) canonically endorsed John’s defense of icons [5].
SCOPs (Skeptical or Contrary Opinion Points)
S1: Some historians question whether Leo III’s 730 edict was as harsh as later chroniclers suggest [2][13].
S2: Others argue John’s influence has been exaggerated, since resistance already existed [3][11][13].
S3: The miracle of John’s severed hand being restored is regarded as legend, not history [3].
S4: Some scholars emphasize political motives, not theology, as driving iconoclasm [4][10].
S5: Modern critics caution against connecting icon veneration too closely to biblical commands for worship [7].
References
Equipment
Credits
Host: Bob Baulch
Producer: That’s Jesus Channel
Topic Support: Assisted by Copilot (Microsoft Corp) for narrowing topics to decades and applications
Research Support: Assisted by Perplexity.ai for fact-finding and source checks
Script Support: Assisted by ChatGPT (OpenAI) for pacing and coherence
Verification Support: Assisted by Grok (xAI) for quote and reference validation
Digital License: Audio 1 – “Background Music Soft Calm” by INPLUSMUSIC, Pixabay License
Composer: Poradovskyi Andrii (BMI IPI: 01055591064), Source: Pixabay
YouTube: INPLUSMUSIC Channel, Instagram: @inplusmusic
Digital License: Audio 2 – “Epic Trailer Short 0022 Sec” by BurtySounds, Pixabay License
Digital License: Video Visualizer – “Digital Audio Spectrum Sound Wave Equalizer,” Vecteezy Free License
Production Note: Audio and video elements are integrated in post-production without in-script cues.
Small Group Discussion Guide
Opening Thought
In 730 AD, Emperor Leo III banned icons, calling them idolatry. John of Damascus, writing from his monastery near Jerusalem, boldly defended them. For John, icons weren’t idols—they were reminders of Jesus’ incarnation. His writings preserved beauty in worship when imperial power tried to erase it.
Discussion Questions
Scripture for Reflection
Application
View all episodes
By That’s Jesus Channel / Bob Baulch730 AD – John Defends Icons: Faithful Art Reflects Jesus’ Incarnation Today
Published 9/10/2025
Cold Hook 1:21
Show Intro 1:17
Narrative Foundation 1:50
Narrative Development 1:52
Climax & Impact 1:53
Legacy & Relevance 1:23
Reflection & Call 1:22
Outro 1:08
Metadata
In 730 AD, John of Damascus, a monk near Jerusalem, defied Emperor Leo III’s ban on icons. His Three Treatises on the Divine Images argued that depicting Jesus affirmed His incarnation—God made visible. Icons weren’t idols but windows to Christ, like how family photos remind us of loved ones. His writings gave believers language to resist icon smashing, assuring them they were not betraying God but honoring the Word made flesh. John also composed hymns still sung today, weaving theology into worship. Though the emperor tried to silence him, John’s words endured, shaping the Second Council of Nicaea (787), which upheld veneration of icons. His legacy reminds us that worship is never about style—chant, hymn, or guitar—but about Jesus Himself. This episode challenges us to honor Christ in every form of devotion, seeing beauty not as an idol but as a testimony to the God who became flesh.
Keywords (≤500 characters)
John of Damascus, iconoclasm, defense of icons, Three Treatises on the Divine Images, Leo III, Byzantine icon ban, Second Council of Nicaea, Christian art, incarnation, Eastern Orthodox tradition, veneration vs worship, visual theology, Byzantine history, 8th century Christianity, hymn writer, Jerusalem monastery, icons, Christian worship, council of Nicaea II
Hashtags
#ChurchHistory #JohnofDamascus #Icons #Byzantine #OrthodoxFaith
Script Chunks
Cold Hook
The decree came like a hammer from Constantinople [kon-stan-TEE-noh-pul]. Emperor Leo III had spoken: the holy images that filled churches—the icons of Christ, the saints, scenes from scripture—they were to be destroyed. For generations, believers had prayed before them, not as idols, but as reminders of the God who became visible in Jesus.
Now soldiers tore them from walls, smashed them in the streets, and mocked those who wept. In one village, worshipers walked into church to find blank walls where saints once looked back at them. For the first time, children saw plaster instead of the story.
Most stayed silent, afraid of imperial power. But in a monastery near Jerusalem [jer-uh-SAH-lum], one voice refused to be silenced. John of Damascus [duh-MAS-kus], a scholar and hymn writer, took up his pen.
His Three Treatises on the Divine Images defended what emperors sought to erase. He argued that to honor Christ’s image was to honor His incarnation—that God took on flesh, and therefore could be pictured. This was no academic debate. It was faith under siege, fought not with swords, but with ink and conviction.
Show Intro
From the That’s Jesus Channel, welcome to COACH—Church Origins and Church History.
I’m Bob Baulch.
On Wednesdays, we stay between 500 and 1500 AD.
Today we turn to the year 730, when an emperor tried to erase the images of Jesus from the life of the church—and one man dared to answer. John of Damascus, writing from his monastery near Jerusalem, defended the use of icons at a time when Emperor Leo III had banned them.
To Leo, images were dangerous, too close to idolatry. But to John, they were reminders of the Word made flesh—that the invisible God had become visible in Jesus. His Three Treatises on the Divine Images spread quickly, strengthening resistance to icon smashing and shaping worship for centuries to come.
This was more than art. It was about how believers remembered Jesus and confessed His presence in their midst.
Narrative Foundation
By the early eighth century, tension in the Byzantine Empire was rising. Emperor Leo III had issued an edict: icons—the painted images of Jesus, Mary, and the saints—were to be banned. He believed such images broke the commandment against idolatry. Soldiers obeyed by tearing icons from churches and burning them in public squares.
But for many Christians, icons weren’t idols. They were windows into the story of salvation. An image of Jesus at His baptism reminded them that God had entered human history. A painting of Mary holding her child spoke of the mystery of the incarnation. To pray in front of these images was not to worship wood and paint but to remember the Savior who had come in flesh.
It’s like deleting every photo of your family from your phone. You don’t worship those pixels—but without them, something important is missing.
Into this storm stepped John of Damascus. Living under Muslim rule near Jerusalem, he was out of reach of the emperor’s direct power. That gave him freedom to speak when others were silenced. John was already respected as a theologian and hymn writer. His words carried weight.
QUOTE: “I do not worship matter, but the Creator of matter, who became matter for my sake.” In 730, he wrote his Three Treatises, arguing that if Jesus truly became man—visible, touchable—then it was right for Christians to depict Him.
Narrative Development
John of Damascus built his case with bold clarity. He reminded readers of the Old Testament’s warnings against idols—but then pointed to the New Testament, where God Himself took on a human face.
QUOTE: “In former times, God, who is without form, could in no way be represented. But now, when God is seen in the flesh, I make an image of the God who can be seen.”
For John, the heart of the matter was Jesus’ incarnation. If the Word truly became flesh, then Christians could paint Him without blasphemy. To forbid His image was, in John’s eyes, to strip away part of the gospel.
When John wrote hymns like “Come, Ye Faithful, Raise the Strain,” believers weren’t just singing poetry—they were singing theology: that Christ really lived, died, and rose in the flesh.
His writings also explained how icons functioned in devotion. They were not worshiped but honored—much like a Christian might kiss a Bible, not as an object of power but as a sign of love for the One it revealed. Icons trained the eye to look beyond paint to the greater reality: Jesus reigning at the right hand of the Father.
John’s treatises spread among monks, carried across the empire. In dark days when emperors demanded silence, his words became a lifeline for believers who longed to keep beauty in their worship.
Climax & Immediate Impact
John of Damascus could not swing a sword against Emperor Leo III, but his pen cut deep. His treatises reached Christian communities torn by fear. Soldiers had already smashed sacred images in churches, and many leaders stayed silent to survive. Yet John’s arguments gave ordinary believers language to defend what they cherished.
In monasteries, his words were copied and read aloud. They fueled resistance to imperial decrees, assuring the faithful that honoring icons was not betrayal but confession of Jesus’ incarnation. Far from idolatry, it was an act of witness.
The emperor, furious at John’s defiance, tried to discredit him. Stories tell that Leo forged a letter to the caliph in Damascus, accusing John of treason. John was punished, his hand severed—yet even here legend says God restored it, and John returned to writing hymns and prayers. Whether embellished or not, the story captured his courage.
Leo’s soldiers could smash wood and plaster in a day. But John’s words—copied by monks on scraps of parchment—outlasted emperors and still echo in churches a thousand years later.
It turns out ink has a longer shelf life than an emperor’s temper. Because, in the short term, iconoclasm still spread. But John’s defense planted seeds that later bore fruit. The Second Council of Nicaea (787) declared that icons could be venerated, for they lead believers to contemplation of divine realities.
[AD BREAK]
Legacy & Modern Relevance
John’s legacy endures. His defense of icons shaped more than artwork—it preserved a way of seeing Jesus’ incarnation. The council at Nicaea affirmed, “We define that the holy icons… should be given due veneration, not worship.” By rooting his argument in the reality that God became visible in Jesus, he secured space for beauty in worship.
That truth still echoes. Every generation wrestles with worship. In Paul’s day, believers were told to “sing to one another” from the heart. Centuries later, chants filled basilicas. Instruments entered slowly, debated fiercely. Hymns rose in the Reformation. Gospel songs, revival anthems, and contemporary praise bands followed.
Each wave asked, What does it mean to sing? The form shifted, but the posture was constant: worship that flows from the heart. John’s courage reminds us that style is not the enemy—forgetting the heart is. Icons, hymns, or guitars only matter if they draw us toward Jesus.
Reflection & Call to Action
John of Damascus risked everything to defend a truth greater than paint or stone. He reminded the church that worship is never about the medium—it is about Jesus. The danger is not in using icons, hymns, or instruments. The danger is when we let the form eclipse the One it points to.
So what about us? Do we argue over styles while missing the Savior? Do we fight for preference while forgetting presence? Paul never defined worship by tempo or melody—he described it as hearts overflowing with gratitude.
John’s courage presses us to ask: when culture, power, or even fellow believers challenge our devotion, will we stay silent? Or will we speak, gently but firmly, of the Jesus we cannot deny?
Guarding worship means guarding our hearts. It means remembering that whether we lift our voices with ancient chants or modern choruses, the purpose is the same: to honor the God who became flesh, dwelt among us, and is worthy of praise forever.
Outro
If this story of John of Damascus defending icons challenged or encouraged you, would you consider sharing this episode with a friend? You never know who might need to hear it. And while you’re at it, leaving a review on your podcast app really helps others discover COACH.
Be sure to follow for weekly episodes. References and even contrary opinions are always linked in the show notes. We’ve also placed Amazon links to helpful resources—at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
You can also find COACH episodes on YouTube at the That’s Jesus Channel.
Next time, we’ll explore another turning point where believers faced pressure to compromise their worship.
Thanks for listening to COACH – Church Origins and Church History. I’m Bob Baulch with the That’s Jesus Channel. Have a great day—and be blessed. Honestly, more people probably kiss their phone screens each day than ever kissed an icon—but I won’t be writing three treatises about that.
References
Quotes
Z-Notes (Zero Dispute)
Z1: John of Damascus was a Christian monk and theologian active in the early 8th century near Jerusalem.
Z2: He authored Three Treatises on the Divine Images in defense of icons.
Z3: His argument grounded icon veneration in the incarnation of Jesus Christ.
Z4: He distinguished between veneration (honor) and worship due to God alone.
Z5: Emperor Leo III initiated imperial action against icons in the 8th century.
Z6: The icon controversy is called Byzantine Iconoclasm.
Z7: John wrote outside direct Byzantine control.
Z8: His treatises circulated in monasteries and churches.
Z9: The Second Council of Nicaea (787) restored veneration of icons.
Z10: Nicaea II affirmed that icons direct believers toward divine realities.
Z11: John is also remembered for his hymns, still used in Eastern worship.
Z12: The veneration/worship distinction became standard in Orthodox theology.
POPs (Parallel Orthodox Perspectives)
P1: The Council of Chalcedon (451) affirmed Christ’s full humanity and divinity, supporting John’s reasoning that He could be depicted [6].
P2: Paul urged believers to focus on “Christ in you, the hope of glory” (Colossians 1:27) [8].
P3: Justin Martyr described the Eucharist using material elements as carriers of grace [7].
P4: Later Orthodox theology tied icons directly to the incarnation, echoing John’s work [9][12].
P5: Nicaea II (787) canonically endorsed John’s defense of icons [5].
SCOPs (Skeptical or Contrary Opinion Points)
S1: Some historians question whether Leo III’s 730 edict was as harsh as later chroniclers suggest [2][13].
S2: Others argue John’s influence has been exaggerated, since resistance already existed [3][11][13].
S3: The miracle of John’s severed hand being restored is regarded as legend, not history [3].
S4: Some scholars emphasize political motives, not theology, as driving iconoclasm [4][10].
S5: Modern critics caution against connecting icon veneration too closely to biblical commands for worship [7].
References
Equipment
Credits
Host: Bob Baulch
Producer: That’s Jesus Channel
Topic Support: Assisted by Copilot (Microsoft Corp) for narrowing topics to decades and applications
Research Support: Assisted by Perplexity.ai for fact-finding and source checks
Script Support: Assisted by ChatGPT (OpenAI) for pacing and coherence
Verification Support: Assisted by Grok (xAI) for quote and reference validation
Digital License: Audio 1 – “Background Music Soft Calm” by INPLUSMUSIC, Pixabay License
Composer: Poradovskyi Andrii (BMI IPI: 01055591064), Source: Pixabay
YouTube: INPLUSMUSIC Channel, Instagram: @inplusmusic
Digital License: Audio 2 – “Epic Trailer Short 0022 Sec” by BurtySounds, Pixabay License
Digital License: Video Visualizer – “Digital Audio Spectrum Sound Wave Equalizer,” Vecteezy Free License
Production Note: Audio and video elements are integrated in post-production without in-script cues.
Small Group Discussion Guide
Opening Thought
In 730 AD, Emperor Leo III banned icons, calling them idolatry. John of Damascus, writing from his monastery near Jerusalem, boldly defended them. For John, icons weren’t idols—they were reminders of Jesus’ incarnation. His writings preserved beauty in worship when imperial power tried to erase it.
Discussion Questions
Scripture for Reflection
Application