Comments? Send me a text message.

What gives ordinary people power against those who hold it? One answer is as old as democracy itself: the deliberate, collective withdrawal of cooperation.

The Power of Withdrawal draws on three examples spanning twenty-four hundred years to ask what actually makes collective refusal work — and what each teaches us about the art of resistance.

In ancient Athens, Aristophanes' Lysistrata understood that power flows from cooperation — and that withdrawing what the powerful need most, whether that is labor, money, or something more intimate, is the first principle of effective resistance.

In County Mayo, Ireland, the tenant farmers who invented the word "boycott" took that principle further. They withdrew not just their labor but every form of social and economic cooperation from a cruel land agent — and discovered that total social ostracism, costing the British government ten thousand pounds to harvest crops worth five hundred, was more devastating than violence could ever have been.

In Montgomery, Alabama, the lesson became organizational. The Black community's 381-day refusal to ride segregated buses succeeded not because of a single courageous act, but because of years of invisible preparation — networks built, leadership developed, infrastructure laid — long before anyone knew when it would be needed.

Together these three examples reveal a consistent logic: identify what the powerful cannot do without, withdraw it collectively, and sustain that withdrawal through planning, organization, and strategic discipline.

Authoritarian power depends on our cooperation — our labor, our money, our silence, our compliance. History suggests we have more power to withdraw that cooperation than we have yet chosen to use

Support the show

If you want to support this work, click above, subscribe to the MINDRAMP  Podcast, or sign up for the free Flourish As You Age newsletter for reviews of current research, reflections, updates, and special extras from my book-in-progress