Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share #8: Does the jury's use of playback tools to enhance video evidence result in juror misconduct?
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
#8: Does the jury's use of playback tools to enhance video evidence result in juror misconduct?
People v. Daniels, No. D074033, 2018 WL 4327873 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 11, 2018).
We analyze the juror misconduct issues in the case of People v. Daniels, No. D074033, 2018 WL 4327873 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 11, 2018).
The issues we’re going to discuss are playback tools the jury uses when video evidence is sent back to the jury room and whether changing the contrast ratio on a TV monitor amounts to new evidence.
Remember to use the coupon code "podcast25", exclusively for our podcast listeners, for $25 off our CLE entitled, "Facebook & Today's Juror: 2017's 10 Biggest Juror Misconduct Events" which has been accredited & approved for 1.5 general CLE credit hours in 30 states. Click here to register for our CLE.
Don't let juror misconduct taint your next verdict...
View all episodes
By Nilgun Aykent Zahour: SM JUROR Attorney & Juror Misconduct Legal StrategistPeople v. Daniels, No. D074033, 2018 WL 4327873 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 11, 2018).
We analyze the juror misconduct issues in the case of People v. Daniels, No. D074033, 2018 WL 4327873 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 11, 2018).
The issues we’re going to discuss are playback tools the jury uses when video evidence is sent back to the jury room and whether changing the contrast ratio on a TV monitor amounts to new evidence.
Remember to use the coupon code "podcast25", exclusively for our podcast listeners, for $25 off our CLE entitled, "Facebook & Today's Juror: 2017's 10 Biggest Juror Misconduct Events" which has been accredited & approved for 1.5 general CLE credit hours in 30 states. Click here to register for our CLE.
Don't let juror misconduct taint your next verdict...