This video provides a documentary-style analysis of the public discourse surrounding the 2017 Las Vegas shooting. We examine the rhetorical points raised in the recent Tucker Carlson interview with Ian Carroll, specifically focusing on the divergence between the 2019 FBI Final Report and the witness testimonies/telemetry data cited in the interview. Our goal is to promote media literacy by auditing how complex, high-profile investigations are communicated to the public.

This content is for Educational and Documentary purposes only. We do not advocate for unverified claims; we provide a platform for analyzing conflicting data points in the public record to encourage independent research and critical thought.

The Primary Sources

• FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit: Key Findings (2019)

  • FBI Final Behavioral Unit Report

  • Why use this: This is the official federal analysis of motive. Citing this allows you to contrast "official findings" with the "unanswered questions" raised in the interview.

• LVMPD Force Investigation Team (FIT) Report

  • LVMPD FIT Report continuation (Ballistics & Evidence)

  • Why use this: When Ian Carroll discusses ballistics or the room setup, referencing this official inventory (which lists every weapon and round found) keeps your analysis grounded in the physical record.

• LVMPD Final Criminal Investigative Report (Archive)

  • Official Las Vegas Police High-Profile Records

  • Why use this: This is the hub for all 911 calls, CAD reports, and the final 1 October After-Action review.

• Congressional Record: House Committee on Homeland Security

  • House Homeland Security Committee Hearings Index

  • Why use this: Citing Congressional oversight (like the 2025 "Lessons Learned" hearings) frames the video as a study of Government Transparency.