There was a recent article in The American Spectator with the title: "Amy v. the Anti-Birthers -- Well-prepped to hate her so." Today we talk with the author of this article. He reminds us of a quotation from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg (RGB) from July 7, 2009 printed in New York Times Magazine that was discussing the place of women on the Supreme Court, it said: "Frankly, I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don�t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion.� We just came through the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings of Judge Amy Coney Barrett. A vote on Amy Barrett's nomination is currently scheduled for October 22. After that, Senator McConnell will decide how quickly to move the nomination to the Senate floor. He's expected to act quickly and schedule a vote by Oct. 29. This nominee like the two previous, is a person who holds to the original meaning of the Constitution and is committed to upholding it. So far, Amy Barrett has calmly answered the Senators, and has come through a grueling week of questioning. All that aside, what do we make of this quotation of RGB? What does it show regarding respect for all persons, regardless their status in life or their ethnicity? Do all human beings have equal worth? Are there populations that we don�t want to have too many of? (to quote RBG). What about Down's Syndrome babies? Suppose a person has trisomy 21, that is, three copies of chromosome 21 instead of the usual two copies, in all cells? Does this justify ending their life? By using a real case in history, it helps focus our attention on a very real and timely question: Is it biblically moral to allow abortion? How does God see it? What about black lives? We could even ask: "Does the Constitution stipulate abortion as a right?" How would the original intent of the Constitution weigh in on the matter? Participants: Dr. Paul Kengor, Dan Elmendorf