
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, author and psychoanalyst Graeme Daniels further discusses the aftermath of the trial of AB1775 at the California Superior Court in August, including its anti-climactic judgement. Commentary explores the curious presence of guilt--of a subject of treatment, that of its providers, of an adjudicating state--amidst this battle over privacy rights.
By Graeme Daniels4.1
1111 ratings
In this episode, author and psychoanalyst Graeme Daniels further discusses the aftermath of the trial of AB1775 at the California Superior Court in August, including its anti-climactic judgement. Commentary explores the curious presence of guilt--of a subject of treatment, that of its providers, of an adjudicating state--amidst this battle over privacy rights.

181 Listeners

80 Listeners

112,880 Listeners

56,546 Listeners

638 Listeners

196 Listeners

20 Listeners

65 Listeners

131 Listeners