Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share A Serious Man
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
A Serious Man
Join this week’s guest Krug author of the Bend Dexter Substack and I on the fourteenth episode of In Kino Veritās — a podcast where the guest picks a film, we both watch, and discuss.
We don’t simply review films but dive deep into their themes, characters and cultural context. In this episode two Gentiles — not unlike Jacob & the Angel — wrestle with the 2009 black-comedy film A Serious Man.
Where you can stream A Serious Man
(Use your local library to get a physical copy for free)
Main Points
* Who is Dr. Krug? – Krug philosophy PhD student and novelist, discusses his Substack Bend Dexter and Host of the Tortuga Philosophy Café digital salon for foundational questions like “What is man?” among others.
* Film Pick – Krug selects A Serious Man (2009), calling it one of the Coen brothers’ most thematically rich, if under-discussed, films.
* Opening Prologue – Krug analyzes the prologue’s “dybbuk” figure as a symbol of uncertainty and inherited curse. Theon suggests it represents modernity inhabiting a dead faith.
* Physics and Paralysis – Schrödinger’s cat and the two-slit experiment are referenced to explain Larry’s passivity and the theme of inaction.
* Consequences and Irony – Larry repeatedly says “actions have consequences,” yet suffers for others’ actions while his own go unnoticed.
* Jewish Suffering – Krug explores Old Testament ideas of suffering as ancestral penance; Larry may be trapped in a generational curse of disbelief.
* Bellow and Roth – Krug ties the film to Jewish literary traditions (esp. Bellow’s Herzog), emphasizing themes of confusion, doubt, and failed intellectualism.
* Failed Stoicism – The film critiques attempts at stoicism and rational understanding of suffering. God’s Job-like response: overwhelming and unhelpful.
* Sy Ableman – Described as a manipulative figure posing as empathetic. Revealed to be sabotaging Larry’s career behind the scenes.
* Tragedy and Futility – Larry is punished by the universe with no clear logic. The film mocks the search for meaning or moral clarity.
* Brent the Neighbor – Representing a threatening gentile archetype, Brent brings Jewish anxieties into focus, despite seeming mild on the surface.
* Causality and Bribery – Larry’s acceptance of a bribe doesn’t clearly trigger catastrophe. The film highlights the futility of cause-and-effect logic.
* Embracing Mystery – The Korean student’s line “accept the mystery” captures the film’s entire ethos.
* Finis – Larry cannot achieve nobility in real life — only in dreams (luftmensch). The film closes with open-ended destruction, rejecting theodicy, redemption, and neat closure.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit ultimatum.substack.com/subscribe
View all episodes
By Theon UltimaJoin this week’s guest Krug author of the Bend Dexter Substack and I on the fourteenth episode of In Kino Veritās — a podcast where the guest picks a film, we both watch, and discuss.
We don’t simply review films but dive deep into their themes, characters and cultural context. In this episode two Gentiles — not unlike Jacob & the Angel — wrestle with the 2009 black-comedy film A Serious Man.
Where you can stream A Serious Man
(Use your local library to get a physical copy for free)
Main Points
* Who is Dr. Krug? – Krug philosophy PhD student and novelist, discusses his Substack Bend Dexter and Host of the Tortuga Philosophy Café digital salon for foundational questions like “What is man?” among others.
* Film Pick – Krug selects A Serious Man (2009), calling it one of the Coen brothers’ most thematically rich, if under-discussed, films.
* Opening Prologue – Krug analyzes the prologue’s “dybbuk” figure as a symbol of uncertainty and inherited curse. Theon suggests it represents modernity inhabiting a dead faith.
* Physics and Paralysis – Schrödinger’s cat and the two-slit experiment are referenced to explain Larry’s passivity and the theme of inaction.
* Consequences and Irony – Larry repeatedly says “actions have consequences,” yet suffers for others’ actions while his own go unnoticed.
* Jewish Suffering – Krug explores Old Testament ideas of suffering as ancestral penance; Larry may be trapped in a generational curse of disbelief.
* Bellow and Roth – Krug ties the film to Jewish literary traditions (esp. Bellow’s Herzog), emphasizing themes of confusion, doubt, and failed intellectualism.
* Failed Stoicism – The film critiques attempts at stoicism and rational understanding of suffering. God’s Job-like response: overwhelming and unhelpful.
* Sy Ableman – Described as a manipulative figure posing as empathetic. Revealed to be sabotaging Larry’s career behind the scenes.
* Tragedy and Futility – Larry is punished by the universe with no clear logic. The film mocks the search for meaning or moral clarity.
* Brent the Neighbor – Representing a threatening gentile archetype, Brent brings Jewish anxieties into focus, despite seeming mild on the surface.
* Causality and Bribery – Larry’s acceptance of a bribe doesn’t clearly trigger catastrophe. The film highlights the futility of cause-and-effect logic.
* Embracing Mystery – The Korean student’s line “accept the mystery” captures the film’s entire ethos.
* Finis – Larry cannot achieve nobility in real life — only in dreams (luftmensch). The film closes with open-ended destruction, rejecting theodicy, redemption, and neat closure.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit ultimatum.substack.com/subscribe