
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


On 31 March this year, the British scientist Geoffrey Hinton resigned from Google, where he had directed AI research for a decade. Artificial intelligence, he argued, had reached the point where it could rapidly surpass human intelligence, and potentially take control: it was now an existential risk. One of the three ‘godfathers of AI’, Hinton won the Turing Award, the Nobel of computing, in 2018. Now the three scientists who share the award are divided: Yoshua Bengio shares Hinton’s fears and is calling for caution, while Yann LeCun believes AI will bring positive change.
In this New Statesman cover story, Harry Lambert visits Hinton at his home in London for a fascinating extended profile of the man at the heart of today’s debate about AI. He talks to Hinton’s critics, who might disagree on the pace of change but agree that further research and oversight are needed. Are we looking at an existential threat, humanity’s salvation, or both?
This article originally appeared in the 24 June issue of the New Statesman. You can read the text version here.
Written and read by Harry Lambert. If you enjoyed listening to this, you might like Margaret Atwood: why I don’t write utopias.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By The New Statesman4.3
66 ratings
On 31 March this year, the British scientist Geoffrey Hinton resigned from Google, where he had directed AI research for a decade. Artificial intelligence, he argued, had reached the point where it could rapidly surpass human intelligence, and potentially take control: it was now an existential risk. One of the three ‘godfathers of AI’, Hinton won the Turing Award, the Nobel of computing, in 2018. Now the three scientists who share the award are divided: Yoshua Bengio shares Hinton’s fears and is calling for caution, while Yann LeCun believes AI will bring positive change.
In this New Statesman cover story, Harry Lambert visits Hinton at his home in London for a fascinating extended profile of the man at the heart of today’s debate about AI. He talks to Hinton’s critics, who might disagree on the pace of change but agree that further research and oversight are needed. Are we looking at an existential threat, humanity’s salvation, or both?
This article originally appeared in the 24 June issue of the New Statesman. You can read the text version here.
Written and read by Harry Lambert. If you enjoyed listening to this, you might like Margaret Atwood: why I don’t write utopias.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

843 Listeners

154 Listeners

194 Listeners

329 Listeners

992 Listeners

167 Listeners

112 Listeners

21 Listeners

14,495 Listeners

3,091 Listeners

202 Listeners

1,046 Listeners

843 Listeners

941 Listeners

615 Listeners

2,191 Listeners

1 Listeners

0 Listeners